Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ST. JOSEPH MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 03:43 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ST. JOSEPH MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 390096 | PA | 132 beds | Current EBITDA $44.3M → Pro Forma $61.9M (+$17.6M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$334.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$44.3M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$17.6M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$61.9M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$12.8M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$17.6M
Modeled Uplift
$12.7M
Risk-Adjusted
-$4.9M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $12.7M (vs $17.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$6.7M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$6.6M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$4.1M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$214K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$17.6M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$6.7M$6.7M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$6.4M$184K$6.6M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.0M$3.0M$4.1M$12.8M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$214K$214K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT34.7% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.7M$3.3M$5.0M$6.7M$6.7M$6.7M$6.7M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.7M$3.3M$5.0M$6.6M$6.6M$6.6M$6.6M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.4M$2.7M$4.1M$4.1M$4.1M$4.1M$4.1M
Clean Claim Rate$0$107K$214K$214K$214K$214K$214K$214K
Cumulative$0$4.8M$9.6M$14.3M$17.6M$17.6M$17.6M$17.6M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $17.6M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x52% / 8.1x57% / 9.4x61% / 10.7x62% / 11.3x64% / 11.9x
9.0x47% / 6.9x52% / 8.0x56% / 9.1x57% / 9.7x59% / 10.2x
10.0x42% / 5.9x47% / 6.9x51% / 7.9x53% / 8.4x55% / 8.9x
11.0x38% / 5.0x43% / 6.0x47% / 6.9x49% / 7.3x51% / 7.8x
12.0x34% / 4.3x39% / 5.2x43% / 6.0x45% / 6.5x47% / 6.9x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.1x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.4x
Headroom (turns)
7%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 7% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.1x, adding 2.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$44.3M$44.3M13.2%
Year 1$45.6M+$11.7M$57.3M17.1%
Year 2$47.0M+$17.6M$64.6M19.3%
Year 3$48.4M+$17.6M$66.0M19.7%
Year 4$49.8M+$17.6M$67.4M20.1%
Year 5$51.3M+$17.6M$68.9M20.6%
$442.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$758.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$315.6M
Value Created
$68.9M
Exit EBITDA
$70.5M
Organic Growth
$176.1M
RCM Value Creation
$68.9M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$3.3M$5.0M$6.7M$8.0M
Denial Rate Reductio$3.3M$5.0M$6.6M$8.0M
A/R Days Reduction$2.0M$3.1M$4.1M$4.9M
Clean Claim Rate$107K$161K$214K$257K
Total$8.8M$13.2M$17.6M$21.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 106 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin13.2%-18.5%-7.0%5.2%
P88
Net-to-Gross24.6%18.2%25.5%34.7%
P48
Occupancy66.9%44.4%59.6%75.2%
P63
Rev/Bed$2.5M$496K$997K$1.4M
P95
Exp/Bed$2.2M$514K$1.1M$1.6M
P94

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML