Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — LEHIGH VALLEY HOSPITAL - SCHUYLKILL 2026-04-26 09:32 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — LEHIGH VALLEY HOSPITAL - SCHUYLKILL
CCN 390030 | PA | 118 beds | Current EBITDA $-3.1M → Pro Forma $4.0M (+$7.1M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$134.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-3.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$7.1M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$4.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$5.2M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

68%
Realization (C)
$7.1M
Modeled Uplift
$4.8M
Risk-Adjusted
-$2.3M
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Occupancy RateOccupancy Rate has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 68% of modeled bridge. Risk-adjusted uplift: $4.8M (vs $7.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$2.7M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$2.7M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.6M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$86K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$7.1M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$2.7M$2.7M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$2.6M$74K$2.7M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$414K$1.2M$1.6M$5.2M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$86K$86K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT34.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$674K$1.3M$2.0M$2.7M$2.7M$2.7M$2.7M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$667K$1.3M$2.0M$2.7M$2.7M$2.7M$2.7M
A/R Days Reduction$0$547K$1.1M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M
Clean Claim Rate$0$43K$86K$86K$86K$86K$86K$86K
Cumulative$0$1.9M$3.9M$5.8M$7.1M$7.1M$7.1M$7.1M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $7.1M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-6.7x
Pro Forma Leverage
13.2x
Headroom (turns)
203%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 203% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -6.7x, adding 105.7 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-3.1M$-3.1M-2.3%
Year 1$-3.2M+$4.7M$1.5M1.1%
Year 2$-3.3M+$7.1M$3.8M2.8%
Year 3$-3.4M+$7.1M$3.7M2.7%
Year 4$-3.5M+$7.1M$3.6M2.6%
Year 5$-3.6M+$7.1M$3.5M2.6%
$-31.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$38.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$69.4M
Value Created
$3.5M
Exit EBITDA
$-5.0M
Organic Growth
$70.9M
RCM Value Creation
$3.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.3M$2.0M$2.7M$3.2M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.3M$2.0M$2.7M$3.2M
A/R Days Reduction$820K$1.2M$1.6M$2.0M
Clean Claim Rate$43K$65K$86K$104K
Total$3.5M$5.3M$7.1M$8.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 104 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-2.3%-18.7%-6.2%6.9%
P57
Net-to-Gross22.8%17.5%26.1%35.0%
P41
Occupancy53.6%42.5%59.6%75.6%
P36
Rev/Bed$1.1M$477K$821K$1.3M
P66
Exp/Bed$1.2M$443K$961K$1.5M
P61

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML