ML Analysis — LEHIGH VALLEY HOSPITAL - SCHUYLKILL
CCN 390030 | Clustering + Distress + RCM Opportunity
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
Investability Score
Hold / Selective — investigate specific opportunities but be prepared for execution risk.
54
/ 100 (C)
Financial Health9/25
RCM Upside18/25
Market Position15/20
Demand Defensibility10/15
Operational Efficiency2/15
Entry Multiple: 8.0x – 10.0x
Est. MOIC: 1.9x
Risk Factors:
- Negative operating margin
Catalysts:
- RCM optimization could add 3-5pp margin
- Strong commercial payer base protects revenue
- Limited competition supports pricing power
Margin Prediction (Trained Ridge Model)
-5.6%
R²=0.34 | n=4,907 | Grade B | Actual: -2.3%
Ridge regression trained on 4,907 HCRIS hospitals. 90% CI: [-33.9%, 22.7%]. P48 nationally.
| Driver | Value | Effect | Explanation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue/Bed | 1142626.958 | -0.0610 | Lower Revenue/Bed decreases predicted margin | |
| Expense/Bed | 1169185.330 | +0.0601 | Higher Expense/Bed increases predicted margin | |
| Net-to-Gross | 0.229 | -0.0157 | Lower Net-to-Gross decreases predicted margin | |
| Reimbursement Quality | 0.150 | +0.0149 | Higher Reimbursement Quality increases predicted m | |
| Log(Beds) | 4.771 | +0.0092 | Higher Log(Beds) increases predicted margin |
Turnaround: 40%Turnaround possible (40%) but uncertain. Margin improvement depends on improving Revenue/Bed.
Suburban Community Hospit
Archetype
47.3%
Distress Risk
$6.1M
RCM Opportunity
D
Opportunity Grade
2.2%
Projected Margin
Cluster: Suburban Community Hospital
Percentile within cluster: P8. Community hospitals — the largest PE deal category. Focus on RCM improvement and cost optimization at 9-11x.
Nearest Peers
| Hospital | State | Beds |
|---|---|---|
| PROMEDICA HICKMAN HOSPITAL | MI | 58 |
| WATAUGA MEDICAL CENTER | NC | 95 |
| ST LUKES HOSPITAL - EASTON CAMPUS | PA | 29 |
| CULPEPER MEMORIAL HOSPITAL | VA | 70 |
| SOUTHSIDE COMMUNITY HOSPITAL | VA | 80 |
| SPECTRUM HEALTH LUDINGTON | MI | 45 |
Distress Analysis
Risk: Elevated
National distress rate: 49.3%
PA distress rate: 48.1%
Model AUC: 0.629
| Factor | Value | Contribution | Direction |
|---|---|---|---|
| Net To Gross Ratio | 0.228 | -0.062 | ▼ risk |
| Revenue Per Bed | 1142626.958 | +0.026 | ▲ risk |
| Medicaid Day Pct | 0.068 | -0.021 | ▼ risk |
| Occupancy Rate | 0.536 | -0.010 | ▼ risk |
| Medicare Day Pct | 0.277 | -0.009 | ▼ risk |
| Beds | 118.000 | -0.004 | ▼ risk |
RCM Improvement Opportunity
Total (risk-adjusted): $6.1M
Current margin: -2.3%
Projected margin: 2.2%
Grade: D
Comps: 103
Gap analysis vs P75 peers with 60% closure assumption. Confidence-weighted by lever implementation difficulty.
| Lever | Current | Benchmark | Gap | Impact | Confidence | Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payer Mix Optimization | 0.655 | 0.834 | 17.9% | $2.7M | 50% | 24mo |
| Net-to-Gross Ratio Improvement | 0.228 | 0.350 | 12.2% | $1.9M | 65% | 18mo |
| Occupancy Improvement | 0.536 | 0.759 | 22.3% | $1.5M | 55% | 24mo |
Predicted RCM Performance (Public Data Only)
A
RCM Grade
Strong RCM profile — likely low-risk from an operations perspective. Focus diligence on growth thesis.
| Metric | Predicted | 90% CI | Percentile | Assessment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Denial Rate | 2.0% | [2.0%, 25.0%] | P0 | Strong — predicted denial rate is in the top third nationall |
| Days in AR | 26.2 | [25.0, 75.0] | P36 | Strong — predicted days in ar is in the top third nationally |
| Clean Claim Rate | 98.0% | [80.0%, 98.0%] | P0 | Strong — predicted clean claim rate is in the top third. |
| Net Collection Rate | 99.5% | [90.0%, 99.5%] | P8 | Strong — predicted net collection rate is in the top third. |