Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SAMARITAN PACIFIC COMM HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 06:39 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SAMARITAN PACIFIC COMM HOSPITAL
CCN 381314 | OR | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $5.3M → Pro Forma $12.8M (+$7.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$141.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$5.3M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$7.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$12.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$5.4M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

76%
Realization (B)
$7.5M
Modeled Uplift
$5.7M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.8M
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 76% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $5.7M (vs $7.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$2.8M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$2.8M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.7M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$91K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$7.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$2.8M$2.8M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$2.7M$78K$2.8M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$435K$1.3M$1.7M$5.4M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$91K$91K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT59.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$708K$1.4M$2.1M$2.8M$2.8M$2.8M$2.8M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$701K$1.4M$2.1M$2.8M$2.8M$2.8M$2.8M
A/R Days Reduction$0$575K$1.1M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M
Clean Claim Rate$0$45K$91K$91K$91K$91K$91K$91K
Cumulative$0$2.0M$4.1M$6.0M$7.5M$7.5M$7.5M$7.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $7.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x73% / 15.5x77% / 17.6x81% / 19.7x83% / 20.7x85% / 21.8x
9.0x68% / 13.4x72% / 15.3x76% / 17.1x78% / 18.1x80% / 19.0x
10.0x64% / 11.8x68% / 13.4x72% / 15.1x74% / 15.9x76% / 16.8x
11.0x60% / 10.4x64% / 11.9x68% / 13.4x70% / 14.2x72% / 14.9x
12.0x56% / 9.2x60% / 10.6x64% / 12.0x66% / 12.7x68% / 13.4x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
3.5x
Pro Forma Leverage
3.0x
Headroom (turns)
46%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 46% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 3.5x, adding 4.9 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$5.3M$5.3M3.7%
Year 1$5.5M+$5.0M$10.4M7.4%
Year 2$5.6M+$7.5M$13.1M9.2%
Year 3$5.8M+$7.5M$13.2M9.4%
Year 4$6.0M+$7.5M$13.4M9.5%
Year 5$6.1M+$7.5M$13.6M9.6%
$53.0M
Entry EV (10x)
$149.6M
Exit EV (11x)
$96.6M
Value Created
$13.6M
Exit EBITDA
$8.4M
Organic Growth
$74.5M
RCM Value Creation
$13.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.4M$2.1M$2.8M$3.4M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.4M$2.1M$2.8M$3.4M
A/R Days Reduction$862K$1.3M$1.7M$2.1M
Clean Claim Rate$45K$68K$91K$109K
Total$3.7M$5.6M$7.5M$8.9M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 35 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin3.7%-15.0%-6.1%3.8%
P71
Net-to-Gross50.4%46.2%54.5%59.9%
P37
Occupancy62.5%32.9%46.2%59.5%
P74
Rev/Bed$5.7M$1.9M$2.8M$4.2M
P89
Exp/Bed$5.5M$2.0M$2.9M$4.4M
P83

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML