Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — BLUE MOUNTAIN HOSPITAL DISTRICT 2026-04-26 09:06 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — BLUE MOUNTAIN HOSPITAL DISTRICT
CCN 381305 | OR | 16 beds | Current EBITDA $-2.6M → Pro Forma $-1.2M (+$1.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$27.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-2.6M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-1.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

64%
Realization (C)
$1.5M
Modeled Uplift
$932K
Risk-Adjusted
-$534K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 64% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.9M (vs $1.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$557K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$552K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$339K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$18K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$557K$557K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$536K$15K$552K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$86K$254K$339K$1.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$18K$18K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT62.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$139K$279K$418K$557K$557K$557K$557K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$138K$276K$414K$552K$552K$552K$552K
A/R Days Reduction$0$113K$226K$339K$339K$339K$339K$339K
Clean Claim Rate$0$9K$18K$18K$18K$18K$18K$18K
Cumulative$0$399K$799K$1.2M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLossLoss
12.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-2.6M$-2.6M-9.5%
Year 1$-2.7M+$977K$-1.7M-6.3%
Year 2$-2.8M+$1.5M$-1.3M-4.8%
Year 3$-2.9M+$1.5M$-1.4M-5.1%
Year 4$-3.0M+$1.5M$-1.5M-5.4%
Year 5$-3.1M+$1.5M$-1.6M-5.7%
$-26.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$-17.6M
Exit EV (11x)
$8.8M
Value Created
$-1.6M
Exit EBITDA
$-4.2M
Organic Growth
$14.7M
RCM Value Creation
$-1.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$279K$418K$557K$669K
Denial Rate Reductio$276K$414K$552K$662K
A/R Days Reduction$170K$254K$339K$407K
Clean Claim Rate$9K$13K$18K$21K
Total$733K$1.1M$1.5M$1.8M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 24 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-9.5%-12.7%-4.8%3.8%
P29
Net-to-Gross64.8%51.4%57.3%62.4%
P83
Occupancy27.5%32.0%45.0%55.8%
P17
Rev/Bed$1.7M$1.7M$3.8M$4.7M
P25
Exp/Bed$1.9M$1.8M$3.3M$5.1M
P29

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML