Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — LEGACY GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 06:39 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — LEGACY GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL
CCN 380017 | OR | 177 beds | Current EBITDA $-44.2M → Pro Forma $-22.4M (+$21.8M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$415.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-44.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$21.8M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-22.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$15.9M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$21.8M
Modeled Uplift
$15.7M
Risk-Adjusted
-$6.1M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $15.7M (vs $21.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$8.3M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$8.2M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$5.0M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$266K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$21.8M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$8.3M$8.3M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$8.0M$228K$8.2M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.3M$3.8M$5.0M$15.9M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$266K$266K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT37.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$2.1M$4.1M$6.2M$8.3M$8.3M$8.3M$8.3M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$2.1M$4.1M$6.2M$8.2M$8.2M$8.2M$8.2M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.7M$3.4M$5.0M$5.0M$5.0M$5.0M$5.0M
Clean Claim Rate$0$133K$266K$266K$266K$266K$266K$266K
Cumulative$0$5.9M$11.9M$17.7M$21.8M$21.8M$21.8M$21.8M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $21.8M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-44.2M$-44.2M-10.6%
Year 1$-45.5M+$14.6M$-31.0M-7.5%
Year 2$-46.9M+$21.8M$-25.0M-6.0%
Year 3$-48.3M+$21.8M$-26.4M-6.4%
Year 4$-49.7M+$21.8M$-27.9M-6.7%
Year 5$-51.2M+$21.8M$-29.4M-7.1%
$-441.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$-323.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$118.6M
Value Created
$-29.4M
Exit EBITDA
$-70.4M
Organic Growth
$218.3M
RCM Value Creation
$-29.4M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$4.1M$6.2M$8.3M$10.0M
Denial Rate Reductio$4.1M$6.2M$8.2M$9.9M
A/R Days Reduction$2.5M$3.8M$5.0M$6.1M
Clean Claim Rate$133K$199K$266K$319K
Total$10.9M$16.4M$21.8M$26.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 18 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-10.6%-14.9%-11.1%-2.5%
P50
Net-to-Gross37.1%29.6%32.1%37.2%
P69
Occupancy71.7%61.7%69.3%75.2%
P61
Rev/Bed$2.3M$1.9M$2.2M$2.4M
P56
Exp/Bed$2.6M$2.0M$2.2M$2.6M
P69

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML