Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL CORVALLIS 2026-04-26 04:04 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL CORVALLIS
CCN 380014 | OR | 169 beds | Current EBITDA $-97.4M → Pro Forma $-72.9M (+$24.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$466.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-97.4M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$24.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-72.9M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$17.9M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$24.5M
Modeled Uplift
$17.7M
Risk-Adjusted
-$6.9M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $17.7M (vs $24.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$9.3M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$9.2M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$5.7M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$299K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$24.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$9.3M$9.3M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$9.0M$257K$9.2M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.4M$4.2M$5.7M$17.9M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$299K$299K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT37.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$2.3M$4.7M$7.0M$9.3M$9.3M$9.3M$9.3M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$2.3M$4.6M$6.9M$9.2M$9.2M$9.2M$9.2M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.9M$3.8M$5.7M$5.7M$5.7M$5.7M$5.7M
Clean Claim Rate$0$149K$299K$299K$299K$299K$299K$299K
Cumulative$0$6.7M$13.4M$19.9M$24.5M$24.5M$24.5M$24.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $24.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-97.4M$-97.4M-20.9%
Year 1$-100.3M+$16.4M$-84.0M-18.0%
Year 2$-103.3M+$24.5M$-78.8M-16.9%
Year 3$-106.4M+$24.5M$-81.9M-17.6%
Year 4$-109.6M+$24.5M$-85.1M-18.2%
Year 5$-112.9M+$24.5M$-88.4M-18.9%
$-974.0M
Entry EV (10x)
$-972.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$1.9M
Value Created
$-88.4M
Exit EBITDA
$-155.1M
Organic Growth
$245.4M
RCM Value Creation
$-88.4M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$4.7M$7.0M$9.3M$11.2M
Denial Rate Reductio$4.6M$6.9M$9.2M$11.1M
A/R Days Reduction$2.8M$4.3M$5.7M$6.8M
Clean Claim Rate$149K$224K$299K$358K
Total$12.3M$18.4M$24.5M$29.4M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 18 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-20.9%-14.9%-11.1%-2.5%
P12
Net-to-Gross45.2%29.6%32.1%37.2%
P94
Occupancy69.2%61.7%69.3%75.2%
P44
Rev/Bed$2.8M$1.9M$2.2M$2.4M
P88
Exp/Bed$3.3M$2.0M$2.2M$2.6M
P88

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML