Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — TULSA CENTER FOR BEHAVIORAL HEALTH 2026-04-26 08:04 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — TULSA CENTER FOR BEHAVIORAL HEALTH
CCN 374026 | OK | 56 beds | Current EBITDA $163K → Pro Forma $285K (+$122K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$2.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$163K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$122K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$285K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+602bps
Margin Improvement
$78K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

74%
Realization (B)
$122K
Modeled Uplift
$91K
Risk-Adjusted
-$31K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 74% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.1M (vs $0.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$47K
+233bp
Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$41K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$25K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+47bp
Total EBITDA Impact$122K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$39K$8K$47K$012mo
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$41K$41K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$6K$18K$25K$78K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT35.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Denial Rate Reduction$0$12K$24K$36K$47K$47K$47K$47K
Cost to Collect$0$10K$20K$30K$41K$41K$41K$41K
A/R Days Reduction$0$8K$16K$25K$25K$25K$25K$25K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$35K$70K$100K$122K$122K$122K$122K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $122K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x61% / 10.7x65% / 12.3x69% / 13.8x71% / 14.6x73% / 15.4x
9.0x56% / 9.2x60% / 10.6x64% / 11.9x66% / 12.6x68% / 13.3x
10.0x51% / 7.9x56% / 9.2x60% / 10.4x62% / 11.0x63% / 11.7x
11.0x47% / 6.9x52% / 8.1x56% / 9.2x58% / 9.7x59% / 10.3x
12.0x43% / 6.1x48% / 7.1x52% / 8.1x54% / 8.7x56% / 9.2x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
4.8x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.7x
Headroom (turns)
26%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 26% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 4.8x, adding 3.6 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$163K$163K8.0%
Year 1$167K+$82K$249K12.3%
Year 2$173K+$122K$295K14.5%
Year 3$178K+$122K$300K14.8%
Year 4$183K+$122K$305K15.0%
Year 5$189K+$122K$311K15.3%
$1.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$3.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$1.8M
Value Created
$311K
Exit EBITDA
$259K
Organic Growth
$1.2M
RCM Value Creation
$311K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Denial Rate Reductio$24K$36K$47K$57K
Cost to Collect$20K$30K$41K$49K
A/R Days Reduction$12K$19K$25K$30K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$61K$92K$122K$147K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 62 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-50.0%-17.3%-2.7%7.3%
P0
Net-to-Gross18.1%17.5%25.8%35.1%
P27
Occupancy83.7%22.2%36.2%60.3%
P87
Rev/Bed$36K$400K$833K$1.5M
P0
Exp/Bed$283K$431K$1.1M$1.6M
P8

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML