Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MERCY REHAB HOSPITAL OKLAHOMA CITY S 2026-04-26 12:36 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MERCY REHAB HOSPITAL OKLAHOMA CITY S
CCN 373036 | OK | 36 beds | Current EBITDA $1.0M → Pro Forma $1.7M (+$663K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$12.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$1.0M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$663K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$1.7M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+528bps
Margin Improvement
$481K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

68%
Realization (C)
$663K
Modeled Uplift
$448K
Risk-Adjusted
-$215K
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Occupancy RateOccupancy Rate has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 68% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Commercial Payer %, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.4M (vs $0.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$251K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$250K
+199bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$153K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+8bp
Total EBITDA Impact$663K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$251K$251K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$242K$8K$250K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$39K$114K$153K$481K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT48.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$63K$125K$188K$251K$251K$251K$251K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$62K$125K$187K$250K$250K$250K$250K
A/R Days Reduction$0$51K$102K$153K$153K$153K$153K$153K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$181K$362K$538K$663K$663K$663K$663K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $663K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x59% / 10.0x63% / 11.5x67% / 13.0x69% / 13.7x71% / 14.4x
9.0x54% / 8.5x58% / 9.8x62% / 11.2x64% / 11.8x66% / 12.5x
10.0x49% / 7.4x54% / 8.5x58% / 9.7x59% / 10.3x61% / 10.9x
11.0x45% / 6.4x50% / 7.5x54% / 8.5x55% / 9.1x57% / 9.6x
12.0x41% / 5.6x46% / 6.6x50% / 7.6x52% / 8.1x54% / 8.5x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.1x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.4x
Headroom (turns)
21%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 21% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.1x, adding 3.3 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$1.0M$1.0M8.1%
Year 1$1.0M+$442K$1.5M11.8%
Year 2$1.1M+$663K$1.7M13.8%
Year 3$1.1M+$663K$1.8M14.1%
Year 4$1.1M+$663K$1.8M14.4%
Year 5$1.2M+$663K$1.8M14.6%
$10.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$20.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$10.1M
Value Created
$1.8M
Exit EBITDA
$1.6M
Organic Growth
$6.6M
RCM Value Creation
$1.8M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$125K$188K$251K$301K
Denial Rate Reductio$125K$187K$250K$300K
A/R Days Reduction$76K$115K$153K$183K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$332K$497K$663K$796K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 91 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin8.1%-23.7%-9.1%3.4%
P82
Net-to-Gross69.1%20.5%35.6%48.8%
P92
Occupancy53.7%17.8%29.6%55.1%
P71
Rev/Bed$349K$370K$627K$1.1M
P22
Exp/Bed$320K$433K$708K$1.5M
P15

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML