Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MUSCOGEE CREEK NATION LONG TERM CARE 2026-04-26 02:16 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MUSCOGEE CREEK NATION LONG TERM CARE
CCN 372023 | OK | 6 beds | Current EBITDA $660K → Pro Forma $954K (+$294K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$5.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$660K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$294K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$954K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+547bps
Margin Improvement
$206K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

79%
Realization (B)
$294K
Modeled Uplift
$232K
Risk-Adjusted
-$62K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityHigher Payer Diversity increases execution likelih

Expected realization: 79% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Net-to-Gross Ratio, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.2M (vs $0.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$112K
+208bp
Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$107K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$65K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+18bp
Total EBITDA Impact$294K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$103K$8K$112K$012mo
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$107K$107K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$16K$49K$65K$206K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT71.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Denial Rate Reduction$0$28K$56K$84K$112K$112K$112K$112K
Cost to Collect$0$27K$54K$81K$107K$107K$107K$107K
A/R Days Reduction$0$22K$44K$65K$65K$65K$65K$65K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$81K$163K$239K$294K$294K$294K$294K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $294K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x53% / 8.5x58% / 9.8x62% / 11.1x64% / 11.8x65% / 12.4x
9.0x48% / 7.2x53% / 8.3x57% / 9.5x59% / 10.1x61% / 10.7x
10.0x44% / 6.1x48% / 7.2x52% / 8.2x54% / 8.8x56% / 9.3x
11.0x40% / 5.3x44% / 6.2x48% / 7.2x50% / 7.7x52% / 8.1x
12.0x36% / 4.6x40% / 5.5x45% / 6.3x47% / 6.8x48% / 7.2x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.9x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.6x
Headroom (turns)
10%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 10% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.9x, adding 2.6 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$660K$660K12.3%
Year 1$679K+$196K$876K16.3%
Year 2$700K+$294K$994K18.5%
Year 3$721K+$294K$1.0M18.9%
Year 4$742K+$294K$1.0M19.3%
Year 5$765K+$294K$1.1M19.7%
$6.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$11.6M
Exit EV (11x)
$5.1M
Value Created
$1.1M
Exit EBITDA
$1.1M
Organic Growth
$2.9M
RCM Value Creation
$1.1M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Denial Rate Reductio$56K$84K$112K$134K
Cost to Collect$54K$81K$107K$129K
A/R Days Reduction$33K$49K$65K$78K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$147K$221K$294K$353K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 114 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin12.3%-22.5%-8.7%2.4%
P85
Net-to-Gross71.1%35.8%53.0%71.5%
P75
Occupancy97.2%15.4%24.4%38.0%
P100
Rev/Bed$896K$845K$1.4M$2.5M
P28
Exp/Bed$786K$1.1M$1.6M$2.7M
P11

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML