Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — POST ACUTE MEDICAL TULSA 2026-04-26 06:34 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — POST ACUTE MEDICAL TULSA
CCN 372018 | OK | 60 beds | Current EBITDA $2.6M → Pro Forma $3.8M (+$1.2M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$23.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$2.6M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.2M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$3.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$903K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

70%
Realization (C)
$1.2M
Modeled Uplift
$865K
Risk-Adjusted
-$374K
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 70% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Commercial Payer %, Occupancy Rate. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.9M (vs $1.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$471K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$466K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$287K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$15K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.2M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$471K$471K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$453K$13K$466K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$72K$214K$287K$903K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$15K$15K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT35.7% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$118K$235K$353K$471K$471K$471K$471K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$117K$233K$350K$466K$466K$466K$466K
A/R Days Reduction$0$96K$191K$287K$287K$287K$287K$287K
Clean Claim Rate$0$8K$15K$15K$15K$15K$15K$15K
Cumulative$0$337K$675K$1.0M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.2M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x54% / 8.7x59% / 10.0x63% / 11.4x64% / 12.0x66% / 12.7x
9.0x49% / 7.4x54% / 8.6x58% / 9.7x60% / 10.3x61% / 10.9x
10.0x45% / 6.3x49% / 7.4x53% / 8.4x55% / 9.0x57% / 9.5x
11.0x40% / 5.4x45% / 6.4x49% / 7.4x51% / 7.9x53% / 8.3x
12.0x36% / 4.7x41% / 5.6x45% / 6.5x47% / 6.9x49% / 7.4x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.7x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.8x
Headroom (turns)
12%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 12% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.7x, adding 2.7 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$2.6M$2.6M11.1%
Year 1$2.7M+$826K$3.5M14.9%
Year 2$2.8M+$1.2M$4.0M17.0%
Year 3$2.8M+$1.2M$4.1M17.4%
Year 4$2.9M+$1.2M$4.2M17.7%
Year 5$3.0M+$1.2M$4.3M18.1%
$26.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$46.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$20.8M
Value Created
$4.3M
Exit EBITDA
$4.2M
Organic Growth
$12.4M
RCM Value Creation
$4.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$235K$353K$471K$565K
Denial Rate Reductio$233K$350K$466K$560K
A/R Days Reduction$143K$215K$287K$344K
Clean Claim Rate$8K$11K$15K$18K
Total$619K$929K$1.2M$1.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 67 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin11.1%-20.7%-3.8%7.1%
P80
Net-to-Gross20.3%18.1%26.5%35.7%
P30
Occupancy57.7%22.9%37.0%67.0%
P70
Rev/Bed$392K$378K$712K$1.3M
P26
Exp/Bed$349K$399K$1.0M$1.6M
P22

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML