Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SSH - OKLAHOMA CITY INC. 2026-04-26 03:55 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SSH - OKLAHOMA CITY INC.
CCN 372009 | OK | 72 beds | Current EBITDA $4.8M → Pro Forma $7.4M (+$2.6M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$48.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$4.8M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.6M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$7.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.9M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

76%
Realization (B)
$2.6M
Modeled Uplift
$2.0M
Risk-Adjusted
-$608K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 76% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $2.0M (vs $2.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$976K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$966K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$594K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$31K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.6M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$976K$976K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$939K$27K$966K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$150K$444K$594K$1.9M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$31K$31K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT35.3% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$244K$488K$732K$976K$976K$976K$976K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$241K$483K$724K$966K$966K$966K$966K
A/R Days Reduction$0$198K$396K$594K$594K$594K$594K$594K
Clean Claim Rate$0$16K$31K$31K$31K$31K$31K$31K
Cumulative$0$699K$1.4M$2.1M$2.6M$2.6M$2.6M$2.6M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.6M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x56% / 9.1x60% / 10.5x64% / 11.8x66% / 12.5x68% / 13.2x
9.0x51% / 7.7x55% / 8.9x59% / 10.2x61% / 10.8x63% / 11.4x
10.0x46% / 6.6x51% / 7.7x55% / 8.8x56% / 9.4x58% / 9.9x
11.0x42% / 5.7x46% / 6.7x51% / 7.7x52% / 8.2x54% / 8.7x
12.0x38% / 5.0x43% / 5.9x47% / 6.8x49% / 7.3x51% / 7.7x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.5x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.0x
Headroom (turns)
15%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 15% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.5x, adding 2.9 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$4.8M$4.8M9.9%
Year 1$5.0M+$1.7M$6.7M13.7%
Year 2$5.1M+$2.6M$7.7M15.8%
Year 3$5.3M+$2.6M$7.9M16.1%
Year 4$5.4M+$2.6M$8.0M16.4%
Year 5$5.6M+$2.6M$8.2M16.8%
$48.4M
Entry EV (10x)
$90.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$41.6M
Value Created
$8.2M
Exit EBITDA
$7.7M
Organic Growth
$25.7M
RCM Value Creation
$8.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$488K$732K$976K$1.2M
Denial Rate Reductio$483K$724K$966K$1.2M
A/R Days Reduction$297K$445K$594K$712K
Clean Claim Rate$16K$23K$31K$37K
Total$1.3M$1.9M$2.6M$3.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 61 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin9.9%-17.7%-3.8%6.4%
P78
Net-to-Gross16.8%18.9%26.7%35.3%
P15
Occupancy92.3%25.2%45.8%67.6%
P93
Rev/Bed$678K$443K$940K$1.4M
P42
Exp/Bed$610K$444K$1.1M$1.6M
P31

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML