Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — CREEK NATION COMMUNITY HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 09:32 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — CREEK NATION COMMUNITY HOSPITAL
CCN 371333 | OK | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $1.2M → Pro Forma $2.1M (+$817K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$15.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$1.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$817K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$2.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$595K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

59%
Realization (C)
$817K
Modeled Uplift
$485K
Risk-Adjusted
-$331K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 59% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Commercial Payer %, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.5M (vs $0.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$310K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$307K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$189K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$817K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$310K$310K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$299K$9K$307K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$48K$141K$189K$595K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT52.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$78K$155K$233K$310K$310K$310K$310K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$77K$154K$230K$307K$307K$307K$307K
A/R Days Reduction$0$63K$126K$189K$189K$189K$189K$189K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$222K$445K$662K$817K$817K$817K$817K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $817K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x59% / 10.0x63% / 11.5x67% / 13.0x69% / 13.7x71% / 14.5x
9.0x54% / 8.6x58% / 9.9x62% / 11.2x64% / 11.8x66% / 12.5x
10.0x49% / 7.4x54% / 8.6x58% / 9.7x60% / 10.3x61% / 10.9x
11.0x45% / 6.4x50% / 7.5x54% / 8.6x56% / 9.1x57% / 9.6x
12.0x41% / 5.6x46% / 6.6x50% / 7.6x52% / 8.1x54% / 8.6x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.1x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.4x
Headroom (turns)
21%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 21% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.1x, adding 3.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$1.2M$1.2M8.0%
Year 1$1.3M+$544K$1.8M11.7%
Year 2$1.3M+$817K$2.1M13.7%
Year 3$1.4M+$817K$2.2M14.0%
Year 4$1.4M+$817K$2.2M14.3%
Year 5$1.4M+$817K$2.3M14.5%
$12.4M
Entry EV (10x)
$24.8M
Exit EV (11x)
$12.4M
Value Created
$2.3M
Exit EBITDA
$2.0M
Organic Growth
$8.2M
RCM Value Creation
$2.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$155K$233K$310K$373K
Denial Rate Reductio$154K$230K$307K$369K
A/R Days Reduction$94K$142K$189K$227K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$408K$612K$817K$980K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 84 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-50.0%-26.2%-16.7%-1.1%
P0
Net-to-Gross35.6%20.5%40.5%52.2%
P46
Occupancy11.7%15.5%26.0%49.9%
P13
Rev/Bed$621K$343K$604K$1.0M
P51
Exp/Bed$2.9M$484K$731K$1.4M
P95

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML