Corpus Intelligence ML Analysis — CREEK NATION COMMUNITY HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 10:04 UTC
ML Analysis — CREEK NATION COMMUNITY HOSPITAL
CCN 371333 | Clustering + Distress + RCM Opportunity
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.

Investability Score

Speculative — only pursue if turnaround thesis is strong and entry multiple reflects risk.

44
/ 100 (D)
Financial Health3/25
RCM Upside18/25
Market Position13/20
Demand Defensibility6/15
Operational Efficiency4/15
Entry Multiple: 8.0x – 10.0x
Est. MOIC: 1.9x
Risk Factors:
  • Negative operating margin
  • Small facility (<50 beds) — limited scale
  • Low occupancy (<30%) — demand risk
  • Expenses exceed revenue
Catalysts:
  • Limited competition supports pricing power

Margin Prediction (Trained Ridge Model)

-45.9%
R²=0.34 | n=4,907 | Grade B | Actual: -50.0%

Ridge regression trained on 4,907 HCRIS hospitals. 90% CI: [-74.2%, -17.6%]. P7 nationally.

DriverValueEffectExplanation
Expense/Bed2914236.200-0.1549
Higher Expense/Bed decreases predicted margin
Revenue/Bed620846.600-0.1338
Lower Revenue/Bed decreases predicted margin
State Peer Margin-0.088-0.0313
Lower State Peer Margin decreases predicted margin
Log(Beds)3.219-0.0268
Lower Log(Beds) decreases predicted margin
Bed Utilization Value72868.680-0.0265
Lower Bed Utilization Value decreases predicted ma
Turnaround: 4%Low turnaround probability (4%). Structural disadvantages in Expense/Bed and Revenue/Bed.
Under-Performing / Distre
Archetype
64.0%
Distress Risk
$4.2M
RCM Opportunity
A
Opportunity Grade
-22.7%
Projected Margin

Cluster: Under-Performing / Distressed

Percentile within cluster: P94. Deeply negative margins signal severe distress. Evaluate asset-level acquisition at 4-6x normalized EBITDA.

Nearest Peers

HospitalStateBeds
HOLY FAMILY MEMORIAL INCWI58
MIDDLESBORO ARHKY46
ATRIUM HEALTH NAVICENT BALDWINGA86
BON SECOURS COMMUNITY HOSPITALNY98
ADVANCED SPECIALTY HOSP. OF TOLEDOOH40
COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER BRANCHMI75

Distress Analysis

Risk: High
National distress rate: 49.3%
OK distress rate: 58.1%
Model AUC: 0.629
FactorValueContributionDirection
Occupancy Rate0.117+0.379▲ risk
Medicaid Day Pct0.264+0.175▲ risk
Revenue Per Bed620846.600+0.057▲ risk
Beds25.000-0.017▼ risk
Medicare Day Pct0.411+0.014▲ risk
Net To Gross Ratio0.356-0.005▼ risk

RCM Improvement Opportunity

Total (risk-adjusted): $4.2M
Current margin: -50.0%
Projected margin: -22.7%
Grade: A
Comps: 83

Gap analysis vs P75 peers with 60% closure assumption. Confidence-weighted by lever implementation difficulty.

LeverCurrentBenchmarkGapImpactConfidenceTimeline
Occupancy Improvement0.1170.50338.5%$2.5M55%24mo
Payer Mix Optimization0.3250.4189.3%$1.4M50%24mo
Net-to-Gross Ratio Improvement0.3560.52516.9%$307K65%18mo

Predicted RCM Performance (Public Data Only)

A
RCM Grade

Strong RCM profile — likely low-risk from an operations perspective. Focus diligence on growth thesis.

MetricPredicted90% CIPercentileAssessment
Denial Rate2.0%[2.0%, 25.0%]P0Strong — predicted denial rate is in the top third nationall
Days in AR41.0[25.0, 75.0]P83Average — predicted days in ar is near the median.
Clean Claim Rate98.0%[80.0%, 98.0%]P0Strong — predicted clean claim rate is in the top third.
Net Collection Rate97.7%[90.0%, 99.5%]P0Average — predicted net collection rate is near the median.