Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — CORDELL MEMORIAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 12:35 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — CORDELL MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
CCN 371325 | OK | 14 beds | Current EBITDA $-1.2M → Pro Forma $-837K (+$321K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$5.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-1.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$321K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-837K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+544bps
Margin Improvement
$226K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

60%
Realization (C)
$321K
Modeled Uplift
$193K
Risk-Adjusted
-$128K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 60% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Commercial Payer %, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.2M (vs $0.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$122K
+206bp
Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$118K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$72K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+16bp
Total EBITDA Impact$321K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$113K$8K$122K$012mo
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$118K$118K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$18K$54K$72K$226K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT57.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Denial Rate Reduction$0$30K$61K$91K$122K$122K$122K$122K
Cost to Collect$0$29K$59K$88K$118K$118K$118K$118K
A/R Days Reduction$0$24K$48K$72K$72K$72K$72K$72K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$89K$177K$261K$321K$321K$321K$321K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $321K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-1.2M$-1.2M-19.6%
Year 1$-1.2M+$214K$-979K-16.6%
Year 2$-1.2M+$321K$-907K-15.4%
Year 3$-1.3M+$321K$-944K-16.0%
Year 4$-1.3M+$321K$-982K-16.7%
Year 5$-1.3M+$321K$-1.0M-17.3%
$-11.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$-11.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$344K
Value Created
$-1.0M
Exit EBITDA
$-1.8M
Organic Growth
$3.2M
RCM Value Creation
$-1.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Denial Rate Reductio$61K$91K$122K$146K
Cost to Collect$59K$88K$118K$141K
A/R Days Reduction$36K$54K$72K$86K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$160K$241K$321K$385K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 54 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-19.6%-45.1%-17.7%-5.8%
P43
Net-to-Gross44.7%28.4%45.5%57.6%
P45
Occupancy14.3%15.5%28.4%52.7%
P20
Rev/Bed$421K$327K$604K$850K
P36
Exp/Bed$504K$504K$730K$1.2M
P24

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML