Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MERCY HOSPITAL TISHOMINGO 2026-04-26 14:10 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MERCY HOSPITAL TISHOMINGO
CCN 371304 | OK | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $314K → Pro Forma $808K (+$494K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$9.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$314K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$494K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$808K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+533bps
Margin Improvement
$355K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

62%
Realization (C)
$494K
Modeled Uplift
$306K
Risk-Adjusted
-$188K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 62% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.3M (vs $0.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$186K
+201bp
Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$185K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$113K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+10bp
Total EBITDA Impact$494K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$178K$8K$186K$012mo
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$185K$185K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$28K$84K$113K$355K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT52.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Denial Rate Reduction$0$47K$93K$140K$186K$186K$186K$186K
Cost to Collect$0$46K$93K$139K$185K$185K$185K$185K
A/R Days Reduction$0$38K$75K$113K$113K$113K$113K$113K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$135K$270K$401K$494K$494K$494K$494K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $494K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x76% / 16.7x80% / 18.9x84% / 21.2x86% / 22.3x88% / 23.4x
9.0x71% / 14.5x75% / 16.5x79% / 18.4x81% / 19.4x83% / 20.4x
10.0x66% / 12.7x71% / 14.5x75% / 16.3x77% / 17.2x78% / 18.1x
11.0x62% / 11.3x67% / 12.9x71% / 14.5x73% / 15.3x74% / 16.1x
12.0x59% / 10.1x63% / 11.5x67% / 13.0x69% / 13.8x71% / 14.5x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
3.3x
Pro Forma Leverage
3.2x
Headroom (turns)
49%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 49% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 3.3x, adding 5.2 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$314K$314K3.4%
Year 1$324K+$329K$653K7.1%
Year 2$333K+$494K$827K8.9%
Year 3$343K+$494K$837K9.0%
Year 4$354K+$494K$847K9.2%
Year 5$364K+$494K$858K9.3%
$3.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$9.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$6.3M
Value Created
$858K
Exit EBITDA
$500K
Organic Growth
$4.9M
RCM Value Creation
$858K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Denial Rate Reductio$93K$140K$186K$224K
Cost to Collect$93K$139K$185K$222K
A/R Days Reduction$56K$84K$113K$135K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$247K$370K$494K$592K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 84 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin3.4%-26.2%-16.7%-1.1%
P82
Net-to-Gross49.8%20.5%40.5%52.2%
P72
Occupancy29.1%15.5%26.0%49.9%
P55
Rev/Bed$370K$343K$604K$1.0M
P27
Exp/Bed$358K$484K$731K$1.4M
P15

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML