Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — OKLAHOMA HEART HOSPITAL SOUTH 2026-04-26 03:58 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — OKLAHOMA HEART HOSPITAL SOUTH
CCN 370234 | OK | 43 beds | Current EBITDA $-854K → Pro Forma $7.0M (+$7.8M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$148.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-854K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$7.8M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$7.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$5.7M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

79%
Realization (B)
$7.8M
Modeled Uplift
$6.2M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.7M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 79% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $6.2M (vs $7.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$3.0M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$2.9M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.8M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$95K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$7.8M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$3.0M$3.0M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$2.9M$82K$2.9M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$456K$1.4M$1.8M$5.7M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$95K$95K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT46.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$742K$1.5M$2.2M$3.0M$3.0M$3.0M$3.0M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$735K$1.5M$2.2M$2.9M$2.9M$2.9M$2.9M
A/R Days Reduction$0$602K$1.2M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M
Clean Claim Rate$0$48K$95K$95K$95K$95K$95K$95K
Cumulative$0$2.1M$4.3M$6.3M$7.8M$7.8M$7.8M$7.8M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $7.8M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-1.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
7.5x
Headroom (turns)
116%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 116% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -1.0x, adding 100.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-854K$-854K-0.6%
Year 1$-879K+$5.2M$4.3M2.9%
Year 2$-906K+$7.8M$6.9M4.7%
Year 3$-933K+$7.8M$6.9M4.6%
Year 4$-961K+$7.8M$6.9M4.6%
Year 5$-990K+$7.8M$6.8M4.6%
$-8.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$75.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$83.6M
Value Created
$6.8M
Exit EBITDA
$-1.4M
Organic Growth
$78.1M
RCM Value Creation
$6.8M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.5M$2.2M$3.0M$3.6M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.5M$2.2M$2.9M$3.5M
A/R Days Reduction$903K$1.4M$1.8M$2.2M
Clean Claim Rate$48K$71K$95K$114K
Total$3.9M$5.9M$7.8M$9.4M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 93 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-0.6%-23.3%-9.6%3.3%
P67
Net-to-Gross23.9%20.4%32.5%46.4%
P31
Occupancy89.8%19.6%32.9%53.7%
P94
Rev/Bed$3.5M$373K$634K$1.3M
P98
Exp/Bed$3.5M$428K$739K$1.6M
P95

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML