Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ST. JOHN OWASSO 2026-04-26 07:59 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ST. JOHN OWASSO
CCN 370227 | OK | 54 beds | Current EBITDA $427K → Pro Forma $2.5M (+$2.0M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$38.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$427K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.0M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$2.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.5M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

62%
Realization (C)
$2.0M
Modeled Uplift
$1.3M
Risk-Adjusted
-$773K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 62% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.3M (vs $2.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$769K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$761K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$468K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$25K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.0M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$769K$769K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$740K$21K$761K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$118K$350K$468K$1.5M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$25K$25K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT35.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$192K$385K$577K$769K$769K$769K$769K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$190K$381K$571K$761K$761K$761K$761K
A/R Days Reduction$0$156K$312K$468K$468K$468K$468K$468K
Clean Claim Rate$0$12K$25K$25K$25K$25K$25K$25K
Cumulative$0$551K$1.1M$1.6M$2.0M$2.0M$2.0M$2.0M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.0M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x109% / 39.9x114% / 44.6x118% / 49.4x120% / 51.8x122% / 54.2x
9.0x104% / 35.1x108% / 39.3x113% / 43.6x115% / 45.7x117% / 47.8x
10.0x99% / 31.2x104% / 35.1x108% / 38.9x110% / 40.8x112% / 42.7x
11.0x95% / 28.1x99% / 31.6x104% / 35.1x106% / 36.8x108% / 38.5x
12.0x91% / 25.5x96% / 28.7x100% / 31.9x102% / 33.5x104% / 35.1x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
1.5x
Pro Forma Leverage
5.0x
Headroom (turns)
77%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 77% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 1.5x, adding 7.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$427K$427K1.1%
Year 1$440K+$1.3M$1.8M4.7%
Year 2$453K+$2.0M$2.5M6.4%
Year 3$467K+$2.0M$2.5M6.5%
Year 4$481K+$2.0M$2.5M6.5%
Year 5$495K+$2.0M$2.5M6.5%
$4.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$27.7M
Exit EV (11x)
$23.4M
Value Created
$2.5M
Exit EBITDA
$681K
Organic Growth
$20.2M
RCM Value Creation
$2.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$385K$577K$769K$923K
Denial Rate Reductio$381K$571K$761K$914K
A/R Days Reduction$234K$351K$468K$562K
Clean Claim Rate$12K$18K$25K$30K
Total$1.0M$1.5M$2.0M$2.4M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 62 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin1.1%-17.3%-2.7%7.3%
P61
Net-to-Gross24.0%17.5%25.8%35.1%
P43
Occupancy26.5%22.2%36.2%60.3%
P37
Rev/Bed$712K$400K$833K$1.5M
P46
Exp/Bed$704K$431K$1.1M$1.6M
P42

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML