Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MCBRIDE CLINIC ORTHOPEDIC HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 03:58 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MCBRIDE CLINIC ORTHOPEDIC HOSPITAL
CCN 370222 | OK | 68 beds | Current EBITDA $-8.3M → Pro Forma $460K (+$8.8M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$166.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-8.3M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$8.8M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$460K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$6.4M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

64%
Realization (C)
$8.8M
Modeled Uplift
$5.6M
Risk-Adjusted
-$3.2M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 64% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $5.6M (vs $8.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$3.3M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$3.3M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$2.0M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$107K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$8.8M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$3.3M$3.3M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$3.2M$92K$3.3M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$512K$1.5M$2.0M$6.4M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$107K$107K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT34.3% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$834K$1.7M$2.5M$3.3M$3.3M$3.3M$3.3M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$826K$1.7M$2.5M$3.3M$3.3M$3.3M$3.3M
A/R Days Reduction$0$677K$1.4M$2.0M$2.0M$2.0M$2.0M$2.0M
Clean Claim Rate$0$53K$107K$107K$107K$107K$107K$107K
Cumulative$0$2.4M$4.8M$7.1M$8.8M$8.8M$8.8M$8.8M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $8.8M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-153.1x
Pro Forma Leverage
159.6x
Headroom (turns)
2456%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 2456% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -153.1x, adding 252.1 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-8.3M$-8.3M-5.0%
Year 1$-8.6M+$5.9M$-2.7M-1.6%
Year 2$-8.8M+$8.8M$-47K-0.0%
Year 3$-9.1M+$8.8M$-312K-0.2%
Year 4$-9.4M+$8.8M$-584K-0.4%
Year 5$-9.6M+$8.8M$-865K-0.5%
$-83.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$-9.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$73.7M
Value Created
$-865K
Exit EBITDA
$-13.3M
Organic Growth
$87.8M
RCM Value Creation
$-865K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.7M$2.5M$3.3M$4.0M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.7M$2.5M$3.3M$4.0M
A/R Days Reduction$1.0M$1.5M$2.0M$2.4M
Clean Claim Rate$53K$80K$107K$128K
Total$4.4M$6.6M$8.8M$10.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 64 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-5.0%-20.2%-4.4%6.8%
P48
Net-to-Gross35.7%18.8%26.2%34.3%
P76
Occupancy25.2%23.5%45.2%67.5%
P30
Rev/Bed$2.5M$395K$727K$1.3M
P90
Exp/Bed$2.6M$425K$996K$1.6M
P88

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML