Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — LAKESIDE WOMENS HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 12:35 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — LAKESIDE WOMENS HOSPITAL
CCN 370199 | OK | 23 beds | Current EBITDA $5.4M → Pro Forma $7.2M (+$1.7M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$33.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$5.4M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.7M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$7.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

74%
Realization (B)
$1.7M
Modeled Uplift
$1.3M
Risk-Adjusted
-$460K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 73% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.3M (vs $1.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$660K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$653K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$402K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$21K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.7M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$660K$660K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$635K$18K$653K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$101K$300K$402K$1.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$21K$21K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT52.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$165K$330K$495K$660K$660K$660K$660K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$163K$327K$490K$653K$653K$653K$653K
A/R Days Reduction$0$134K$268K$402K$402K$402K$402K$402K
Clean Claim Rate$0$11K$21K$21K$21K$21K$21K$21K
Cumulative$0$473K$945K$1.4M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.7M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x50% / 7.6x54% / 8.8x58% / 10.0x60% / 10.6x62% / 11.2x
9.0x45% / 6.4x49% / 7.4x53% / 8.5x55% / 9.0x57% / 9.6x
10.0x40% / 5.4x45% / 6.4x49% / 7.3x51% / 7.8x53% / 8.3x
11.0x36% / 4.6x41% / 5.5x45% / 6.4x47% / 6.8x49% / 7.2x
12.0x32% / 4.0x37% / 4.8x41% / 5.6x43% / 6.0x45% / 6.4x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.4x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.1x
Headroom (turns)
1%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 1% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.4x, adding 2.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$5.4M$5.4M16.5%
Year 1$5.6M+$1.2M$6.8M20.5%
Year 2$5.8M+$1.7M$7.5M22.8%
Year 3$5.9M+$1.7M$7.7M23.3%
Year 4$6.1M+$1.7M$7.9M23.8%
Year 5$6.3M+$1.7M$8.0M24.4%
$54.4M
Entry EV (10x)
$88.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$34.1M
Value Created
$8.0M
Exit EBITDA
$8.7M
Organic Growth
$17.4M
RCM Value Creation
$8.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$330K$495K$660K$792K
Denial Rate Reductio$327K$490K$653K$784K
A/R Days Reduction$201K$301K$402K$482K
Clean Claim Rate$11K$16K$21K$25K
Total$868K$1.3M$1.7M$2.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 80 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin16.5%-27.2%-16.8%-1.4%
P96
Net-to-Gross18.6%20.3%41.1%52.2%
P19
Occupancy75.8%14.7%25.6%49.9%
P92
Rev/Bed$1.4M$338K$604K$1.0M
P85
Exp/Bed$1.2M$484K$731K$1.4M
P68

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML