Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — NORTHWEST SURGICAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 12:35 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — NORTHWEST SURGICAL HOSPITAL
CCN 370192 | OK | 9 beds | Current EBITDA $2.3M → Pro Forma $3.3M (+$947K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$18.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$2.3M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$947K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$3.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$690K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

62%
Realization (C)
$947K
Modeled Uplift
$582K
Risk-Adjusted
-$364K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 62% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count, Revenue per Bed. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.6M (vs $0.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$360K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$356K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$219K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$12K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$947K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$360K$360K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$346K$10K$356K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$55K$164K$219K$690K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$12K$12K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT65.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$90K$180K$270K$360K$360K$360K$360K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$89K$178K$267K$356K$356K$356K$356K
A/R Days Reduction$0$73K$146K$219K$219K$219K$219K$219K
Clean Claim Rate$0$6K$12K$12K$12K$12K$12K$12K
Cumulative$0$258K$516K$768K$947K$947K$947K$947K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $947K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x52% / 8.2x57% / 9.5x61% / 10.8x63% / 11.4x64% / 12.1x
9.0x47% / 7.0x52% / 8.1x56% / 9.2x58% / 9.8x60% / 10.3x
10.0x43% / 5.9x47% / 7.0x51% / 8.0x53% / 8.5x55% / 9.0x
11.0x38% / 5.1x43% / 6.0x47% / 7.0x49% / 7.4x51% / 7.9x
12.0x34% / 4.4x39% / 5.2x44% / 6.1x46% / 6.5x47% / 7.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.5x
Headroom (turns)
8%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 8% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.0x, adding 2.5 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$2.3M$2.3M12.9%
Year 1$2.4M+$631K$3.0M16.7%
Year 2$2.5M+$947K$3.4M18.9%
Year 3$2.5M+$947K$3.5M19.3%
Year 4$2.6M+$947K$3.6M19.7%
Year 5$2.7M+$947K$3.6M20.2%
$23.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$39.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$16.8M
Value Created
$3.6M
Exit EBITDA
$3.7M
Organic Growth
$9.5M
RCM Value Creation
$3.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$180K$270K$360K$432K
Denial Rate Reductio$178K$267K$356K$428K
A/R Days Reduction$109K$164K$219K$263K
Clean Claim Rate$6K$9K$12K$14K
Total$473K$710K$947K$1.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 15 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin12.9%-27.6%-19.8%-13.8%
P93
Net-to-Gross27.0%22.2%50.4%65.8%
P29
Occupancy16.4%14.9%37.2%55.9%
P33
Rev/Bed$2.0M$409K$718K$1.0M
P93
Exp/Bed$1.7M$601K$990K$1.2M
P93

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML