Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — PURCELL MUNICIPAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 09:33 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — PURCELL MUNICIPAL HOSPITAL
CCN 370158 | OK | 10 beds | Current EBITDA $-3.7M → Pro Forma $-3.2M (+$436K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$8.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-3.7M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$436K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-3.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+536bps
Margin Improvement
$312K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

61%
Realization (C)
$436K
Modeled Uplift
$267K
Risk-Adjusted
-$170K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 61% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Commercial Payer %, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.3M (vs $0.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$165K
+203bp
Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$163K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$99K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+12bp
Total EBITDA Impact$436K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$157K$8K$165K$012mo
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$163K$163K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$25K$74K$99K$312K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT65.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Denial Rate Reduction$0$41K$82K$124K$165K$165K$165K$165K
Cost to Collect$0$41K$81K$122K$163K$163K$163K$163K
A/R Days Reduction$0$33K$66K$99K$99K$99K$99K$99K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$120K$239K$354K$436K$436K$436K$436K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $436K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-3.7M$-3.7M-45.1%
Year 1$-3.8M+$291K$-3.5M-42.9%
Year 2$-3.9M+$436K$-3.5M-42.5%
Year 3$-4.0M+$436K$-3.6M-43.9%
Year 4$-4.1M+$436K$-3.7M-45.4%
Year 5$-4.3M+$436K$-3.8M-46.9%
$-36.7M
Entry EV (10x)
$-42.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$-5.3M
Value Created
$-3.8M
Exit EBITDA
$-5.8M
Organic Growth
$4.4M
RCM Value Creation
$-3.8M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Denial Rate Reductio$82K$124K$165K$198K
Cost to Collect$81K$122K$163K$195K
A/R Days Reduction$50K$74K$99K$119K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$218K$327K$436K$524K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 16 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-45.1%-36.6%-20.0%-14.7%
P20
Net-to-Gross28.4%24.3%49.2%65.4%
P27
Occupancy15.4%14.7%32.5%55.4%
P31
Rev/Bed$814K$363K$636K$950K
P60
Exp/Bed$1.2M$566K$881K$1.2M
P62

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML