Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SAINT FRANCIS HOSPITAL MUSKOGEE 2026-04-26 04:01 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SAINT FRANCIS HOSPITAL MUSKOGEE
CCN 370025 | OK | 236 beds | Current EBITDA $22.7M → Pro Forma $33.1M (+$10.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$196.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$22.7M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$10.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$33.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$7.5M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

65%
Realization (C)
$10.3M
Modeled Uplift
$6.7M
Risk-Adjusted
-$3.6M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 65% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Commercial Payer %. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $6.7M (vs $10.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$3.9M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$3.9M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$2.4M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$126K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$10.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$3.9M$3.9M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$3.8M$108K$3.9M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$603K$1.8M$2.4M$7.5M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$126K$126K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT24.7% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$983K$2.0M$2.9M$3.9M$3.9M$3.9M$3.9M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$973K$1.9M$2.9M$3.9M$3.9M$3.9M$3.9M
A/R Days Reduction$0$797K$1.6M$2.4M$2.4M$2.4M$2.4M$2.4M
Clean Claim Rate$0$63K$126K$126K$126K$126K$126K$126K
Cumulative$0$2.8M$5.6M$8.4M$10.3M$10.3M$10.3M$10.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $10.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x54% / 8.6x58% / 9.9x62% / 11.2x64% / 11.8x66% / 12.5x
9.0x49% / 7.2x53% / 8.4x57% / 9.6x59% / 10.2x61% / 10.7x
10.0x44% / 6.2x49% / 7.2x53% / 8.3x55% / 8.8x56% / 9.3x
11.0x40% / 5.3x44% / 6.3x49% / 7.2x50% / 7.7x52% / 8.2x
12.0x36% / 4.6x41% / 5.5x45% / 6.4x47% / 6.8x49% / 7.2x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.8x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.7x
Headroom (turns)
11%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 11% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.8x, adding 2.6 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$22.7M$22.7M11.6%
Year 1$23.4M+$6.9M$30.3M15.4%
Year 2$24.1M+$10.3M$34.4M17.5%
Year 3$24.8M+$10.3M$35.2M17.9%
Year 4$25.6M+$10.3M$35.9M18.3%
Year 5$26.3M+$10.3M$36.7M18.7%
$227.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$403.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$176.3M
Value Created
$36.7M
Exit EBITDA
$36.2M
Organic Growth
$103.4M
RCM Value Creation
$36.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$2.0M$2.9M$3.9M$4.7M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.9M$2.9M$3.9M$4.7M
A/R Days Reduction$1.2M$1.8M$2.4M$2.9M
Clean Claim Rate$63K$94K$126K$151K
Total$5.2M$7.8M$10.3M$12.4M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 16 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin11.6%-22.2%-8.0%-0.9%
P94
Net-to-Gross24.8%17.7%22.3%24.7%
P75
Occupancy44.5%44.9%64.9%77.5%
P12
Rev/Bed$833K$757K$1.3M$1.5M
P31
Exp/Bed$737K$730K$1.3M$1.7M
P25

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML