Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ARROWHEAD HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 14:07 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ARROWHEAD HOSPITAL
CCN 364036 | OH | 48 beds | Current EBITDA $608K → Pro Forma $1.1M (+$516K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$9.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$608K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$516K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$1.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+533bps
Margin Improvement
$372K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

67%
Realization (C)
$516K
Modeled Uplift
$344K
Risk-Adjusted
-$173K
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 67% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.3M (vs $0.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$195K
+201bp
Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$194K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$118K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+10bp
Total EBITDA Impact$516K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$187K$8K$195K$012mo
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$194K$194K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$30K$88K$118K$372K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT44.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Denial Rate Reduction$0$49K$97K$146K$195K$195K$195K$195K
Cost to Collect$0$48K$97K$145K$194K$194K$194K$194K
A/R Days Reduction$0$39K$79K$118K$118K$118K$118K$118K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$141K$283K$419K$516K$516K$516K$516K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $516K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x63% / 11.4x67% / 13.1x71% / 14.7x73% / 15.5x75% / 16.3x
9.0x58% / 9.8x62% / 11.3x66% / 12.7x68% / 13.4x70% / 14.2x
10.0x53% / 8.5x58% / 9.8x62% / 11.1x64% / 11.8x66% / 12.4x
11.0x49% / 7.4x54% / 8.6x58% / 9.8x60% / 10.4x62% / 11.0x
12.0x46% / 6.5x50% / 7.6x54% / 8.7x56% / 9.3x58% / 9.8x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
4.6x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.9x
Headroom (turns)
30%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 30% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 4.6x, adding 3.9 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$608K$608K6.3%
Year 1$626K+$344K$970K10.0%
Year 2$645K+$516K$1.2M12.0%
Year 3$664K+$516K$1.2M12.2%
Year 4$684K+$516K$1.2M12.4%
Year 5$705K+$516K$1.2M12.6%
$6.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$13.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$7.4M
Value Created
$1.2M
Exit EBITDA
$968K
Organic Growth
$5.2M
RCM Value Creation
$1.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Denial Rate Reductio$97K$146K$195K$234K
Cost to Collect$97K$145K$194K$233K
A/R Days Reduction$59K$88K$118K$142K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$258K$387K$516K$619K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 115 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin6.3%-13.3%-1.6%10.0%
P66
Net-to-Gross47.9%26.1%35.9%44.8%
P81
Occupancy57.1%27.0%39.0%64.3%
P67
Rev/Bed$202K$369K$951K$1.9M
P9
Exp/Bed$189K$362K$917K$1.9M
P7

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML