Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — CHILDRENS HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 05:22 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — CHILDRENS HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 363300 | OH | 711 beds | Current EBITDA $-504.2M → Pro Forma $-372.3M (+$132.0M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$2.51B
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-504.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$132.0M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-372.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$96.2M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

66%
Realization (C)
$132.0M
Modeled Uplift
$87.6M
Risk-Adjusted
-$44.4M
Execution Discount
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityHigher Payer Diversity increases execution likelih

Expected realization: 66% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $87.6M (vs $132.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$50.2M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$49.7M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$30.5M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$1.6M
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$132.0M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$50.2M$50.2M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$48.3M$1.4M$49.7M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$7.7M$22.8M$30.5M$96.2M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$1.6M$1.6M$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT32.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$12.5M$25.1M$37.6M$50.2M$50.2M$50.2M$50.2M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$12.4M$24.8M$37.2M$49.7M$49.7M$49.7M$49.7M
A/R Days Reduction$0$10.2M$20.3M$30.5M$30.5M$30.5M$30.5M$30.5M
Clean Claim Rate$0$803K$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M
Cumulative$0$35.9M$71.9M$107.0M$132.0M$132.0M$132.0M$132.0M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $132.0M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-504.2M$-504.2M-20.1%
Year 1$-519.3M+$88.0M$-431.4M-17.2%
Year 2$-534.9M+$132.0M$-403.0M-16.1%
Year 3$-551.0M+$132.0M$-419.0M-16.7%
Year 4$-567.5M+$132.0M$-435.5M-17.4%
Year 5$-584.5M+$132.0M$-452.6M-18.0%
$-5.04B
Entry EV (10x)
$-4.98B
Exit EV (11x)
$64.0M
Value Created
$-452.6M
Exit EBITDA
$-803.1M
Organic Growth
$1.32B
RCM Value Creation
$-452.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$25.1M$37.6M$50.2M$60.2M
Denial Rate Reductio$24.8M$37.2M$49.7M$59.6M
A/R Days Reduction$15.3M$22.9M$30.5M$36.6M
Clean Claim Rate$803K$1.2M$1.6M$1.9M
Total$66.0M$99.0M$132.0M$158.4M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 24 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-20.1%-11.1%-0.1%8.1%
P12
Net-to-Gross62.2%25.8%28.7%32.9%
P96
Occupancy64.4%65.6%71.1%78.3%
P12
Rev/Bed$3.5M$1.8M$2.0M$2.4M
P88
Exp/Bed$4.2M$1.8M$2.1M$2.7M
P88

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML