Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — CLEVELAND CLINIC REHABILITATION HOSP 2026-04-26 17:41 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — CLEVELAND CLINIC REHABILITATION HOSP
CCN 363038 | OH | 180 beds | Current EBITDA $9.2M → Pro Forma $15.0M (+$5.9M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$111.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$9.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$5.9M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$15.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$4.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

75%
Realization (B)
$5.9M
Modeled Uplift
$4.4M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.5M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 75% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $4.4M (vs $5.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$2.2M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$2.2M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.4M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$71K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$5.9M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$2.2M$2.2M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$2.1M$61K$2.2M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$342K$1.0M$1.4M$4.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$71K$71K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT30.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$557K$1.1M$1.7M$2.2M$2.2M$2.2M$2.2M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$551K$1.1M$1.7M$2.2M$2.2M$2.2M$2.2M
A/R Days Reduction$0$452K$903K$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M
Clean Claim Rate$0$36K$71K$71K$71K$71K$71K$71K
Cumulative$0$1.6M$3.2M$4.8M$5.9M$5.9M$5.9M$5.9M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $5.9M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x58% / 9.9x63% / 11.4x67% / 12.8x68% / 13.6x70% / 14.3x
9.0x53% / 8.4x58% / 9.7x62% / 11.0x63% / 11.7x65% / 12.3x
10.0x49% / 7.3x53% / 8.4x57% / 9.6x59% / 10.2x61% / 10.8x
11.0x45% / 6.3x49% / 7.4x53% / 8.4x55% / 9.0x57% / 9.5x
12.0x41% / 5.5x45% / 6.5x49% / 7.5x51% / 8.0x53% / 8.4x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.2x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.3x
Headroom (turns)
21%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 21% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.2x, adding 3.3 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$9.2M$9.2M8.2%
Year 1$9.5M+$3.9M$13.4M12.0%
Year 2$9.7M+$5.9M$15.6M14.0%
Year 3$10.0M+$5.9M$15.9M14.3%
Year 4$10.3M+$5.9M$16.2M14.5%
Year 5$10.6M+$5.9M$16.5M14.8%
$91.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$181.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$89.7M
Value Created
$16.5M
Exit EBITDA
$14.6M
Organic Growth
$58.6M
RCM Value Creation
$16.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.1M$1.7M$2.2M$2.7M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.1M$1.7M$2.2M$2.6M
A/R Days Reduction$678K$1.0M$1.4M$1.6M
Clean Claim Rate$36K$53K$71K$86K
Total$2.9M$4.4M$5.9M$7.0M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 79 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin8.2%-9.5%0.6%7.1%
P78
Net-to-Gross28.2%21.8%26.9%30.8%
P55
Occupancy91.9%49.7%57.1%72.5%
P95
Rev/Bed$619K$966K$1.4M$1.7M
P15
Exp/Bed$568K$793K$1.3M$1.7M
P23

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML