Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — BLUFFTON HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 17:33 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — BLUFFTON HOSPITAL
CCN 361322 | OH | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $7.5M → Pro Forma $8.8M (+$1.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$24.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$7.5M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$8.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$943K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

60%
Realization (C)
$1.3M
Modeled Uplift
$778K
Risk-Adjusted
-$517K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 60% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Commercial Payer %, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.8M (vs $1.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$492K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$487K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$299K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$16K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$492K$492K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$474K$14K$487K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$75K$224K$299K$943K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$16K$16K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT47.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$123K$246K$369K$492K$492K$492K$492K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$122K$244K$365K$487K$487K$487K$487K
A/R Days Reduction$0$100K$200K$299K$299K$299K$299K$299K
Clean Claim Rate$0$8K$16K$16K$16K$16K$16K$16K
Cumulative$0$352K$705K$1.0M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x45% / 6.5x50% / 7.6x54% / 8.7x56% / 9.2x58% / 9.7x
9.0x40% / 5.4x45% / 6.4x49% / 7.3x51% / 7.8x53% / 8.3x
10.0x35% / 4.5x40% / 5.4x44% / 6.3x46% / 6.7x48% / 7.1x
11.0x31% / 3.8x36% / 4.6x40% / 5.4x42% / 5.8x44% / 6.2x
12.0x27% / 3.2x32% / 4.0x36% / 4.7x38% / 5.0x40% / 5.4x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
7.2x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.7x
Headroom (turns)
-11%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -11% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 7.2x, adding 1.2 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$7.5M$7.5M30.4%
Year 1$7.7M+$863K$8.6M34.8%
Year 2$7.9M+$1.3M$9.2M37.5%
Year 3$8.2M+$1.3M$9.5M38.5%
Year 4$8.4M+$1.3M$9.7M39.5%
Year 5$8.7M+$1.3M$10.0M40.5%
$74.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$109.6M
Exit EV (11x)
$34.8M
Value Created
$10.0M
Exit EBITDA
$11.9M
Organic Growth
$12.9M
RCM Value Creation
$10.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$246K$369K$492K$590K
Denial Rate Reductio$244K$365K$487K$584K
A/R Days Reduction$150K$224K$299K$359K
Clean Claim Rate$8K$12K$16K$19K
Total$647K$971K$1.3M$1.6M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 83 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin30.4%-11.4%-1.9%11.5%
P98
Net-to-Gross56.1%29.7%38.6%47.6%
P90
Occupancy8.9%25.4%37.1%57.8%
P5
Rev/Bed$984K$436K$1.1M$2.1M
P42
Exp/Bed$685K$421K$1.1M$2.2M
P34

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML