Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — CRYSTAL CLINIC ORTHOPAEDIC CENTER 2026-04-26 09:04 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — CRYSTAL CLINIC ORTHOPAEDIC CENTER
CCN 360351 | OH | 59 beds | Current EBITDA $-25.8M → Pro Forma $-16.7M (+$9.1M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$173.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-25.8M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$9.1M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-16.7M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$6.6M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

64%
Realization (C)
$9.1M
Modeled Uplift
$5.9M
Risk-Adjusted
-$3.2M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 64% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $5.9M (vs $9.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$3.5M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$3.4M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$2.1M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$111K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$9.1M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$3.5M$3.5M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$3.3M$95K$3.4M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$532K$1.6M$2.1M$6.6M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$111K$111K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT44.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$866K$1.7M$2.6M$3.5M$3.5M$3.5M$3.5M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$858K$1.7M$2.6M$3.4M$3.4M$3.4M$3.4M
A/R Days Reduction$0$703K$1.4M$2.1M$2.1M$2.1M$2.1M$2.1M
Clean Claim Rate$0$55K$111K$111K$111K$111K$111K$111K
Cumulative$0$2.5M$5.0M$7.4M$9.1M$9.1M$9.1M$9.1M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $9.1M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-25.8M$-25.8M-14.9%
Year 1$-26.5M+$6.1M$-20.5M-11.8%
Year 2$-27.3M+$9.1M$-18.2M-10.5%
Year 3$-28.2M+$9.1M$-19.1M-11.0%
Year 4$-29.0M+$9.1M$-19.9M-11.5%
Year 5$-29.9M+$9.1M$-20.8M-12.0%
$-257.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$-228.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$29.3M
Value Created
$-20.8M
Exit EBITDA
$-41.1M
Organic Growth
$91.2M
RCM Value Creation
$-20.8M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.7M$2.6M$3.5M$4.2M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.7M$2.6M$3.4M$4.1M
A/R Days Reduction$1.1M$1.6M$2.1M$2.5M
Clean Claim Rate$55K$83K$111K$133K
Total$4.6M$6.8M$9.1M$10.9M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 91 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-14.9%-14.4%1.4%9.4%
P24
Net-to-Gross23.6%23.6%33.1%44.2%
P25
Occupancy24.3%31.2%49.4%67.1%
P10
Rev/Bed$2.9M$350K$592K$1.4M
P94
Exp/Bed$3.4M$314K$551K$1.5M
P98

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML