Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MEMORIAL HOSPITAL OF UNION COUNTY 2026-04-26 14:10 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MEMORIAL HOSPITAL OF UNION COUNTY
CCN 360092 | OH | 51 beds | Current EBITDA $12.0M → Pro Forma $20.0M (+$7.9M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$151.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$12.0M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$7.9M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$20.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$5.8M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

70%
Realization (C)
$7.9M
Modeled Uplift
$5.5M
Risk-Adjusted
-$2.4M
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 70% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $5.5M (vs $7.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$3.0M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$3.0M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.8M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$97K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$7.9M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$3.0M$3.0M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$2.9M$83K$3.0M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$463K$1.4M$1.8M$5.8M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$97K$97K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT45.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$755K$1.5M$2.3M$3.0M$3.0M$3.0M$3.0M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$747K$1.5M$2.2M$3.0M$3.0M$3.0M$3.0M
A/R Days Reduction$0$613K$1.2M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M
Clean Claim Rate$0$48K$97K$97K$97K$97K$97K$97K
Cumulative$0$2.2M$4.3M$6.4M$7.9M$7.9M$7.9M$7.9M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $7.9M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x59% / 10.1x63% / 11.5x67% / 13.0x69% / 13.8x71% / 14.5x
9.0x54% / 8.6x58% / 9.9x62% / 11.2x64% / 11.9x66% / 12.5x
10.0x49% / 7.4x54% / 8.6x58% / 9.8x60% / 10.4x61% / 10.9x
11.0x45% / 6.4x50% / 7.5x54% / 8.6x56% / 9.1x57% / 9.7x
12.0x41% / 5.6x46% / 6.6x50% / 7.6x52% / 8.1x54% / 8.6x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.1x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.4x
Headroom (turns)
22%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 22% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.1x, adding 3.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$12.0M$12.0M8.0%
Year 1$12.4M+$5.3M$17.7M11.7%
Year 2$12.7M+$7.9M$20.7M13.7%
Year 3$13.1M+$7.9M$21.1M14.0%
Year 4$13.5M+$7.9M$21.5M14.2%
Year 5$13.9M+$7.9M$21.9M14.5%
$120.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$240.6M
Exit EV (11x)
$120.5M
Value Created
$21.9M
Exit EBITDA
$19.1M
Organic Growth
$79.4M
RCM Value Creation
$21.9M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.5M$2.3M$3.0M$3.6M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.5M$2.2M$3.0M$3.6M
A/R Days Reduction$919K$1.4M$1.8M$2.2M
Clean Claim Rate$48K$72K$97K$116K
Total$4.0M$6.0M$7.9M$9.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 85 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin8.0%-15.8%-0.8%9.4%
P70
Net-to-Gross37.8%21.9%33.6%45.0%
P61
Occupancy51.6%29.4%49.4%67.2%
P53
Rev/Bed$3.0M$326K$573K$1.4M
P98
Exp/Bed$2.7M$315K$544K$1.4M
P95

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML