Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MERCY HEALTH-TIFFIN HOSPITAL LLC 2026-04-26 15:27 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MERCY HEALTH-TIFFIN HOSPITAL LLC
CCN 360089 | OH | 35 beds | Current EBITDA $18.6M → Pro Forma $24.0M (+$5.4M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$103.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$18.6M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$5.4M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$24.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$4.0M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

73%
Realization (B)
$5.4M
Modeled Uplift
$4.0M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.4M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 73% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $4.0M (vs $5.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$2.1M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$2.0M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.3M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$66K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$5.4M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$2.1M$2.1M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$2.0M$57K$2.0M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$316K$938K$1.3M$4.0M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$66K$66K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT47.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$515K$1.0M$1.5M$2.1M$2.1M$2.1M$2.1M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$510K$1.0M$1.5M$2.0M$2.0M$2.0M$2.0M
A/R Days Reduction$0$418K$836K$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M
Clean Claim Rate$0$33K$66K$66K$66K$66K$66K$66K
Cumulative$0$1.5M$3.0M$4.4M$5.4M$5.4M$5.4M$5.4M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $5.4M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x49% / 7.4x54% / 8.5x58% / 9.7x59% / 10.3x61% / 10.9x
9.0x44% / 6.2x49% / 7.2x53% / 8.3x54% / 8.8x56% / 9.3x
10.0x39% / 5.2x44% / 6.2x48% / 7.1x50% / 7.6x52% / 8.1x
11.0x35% / 4.5x40% / 5.3x44% / 6.2x46% / 6.6x48% / 7.0x
12.0x31% / 3.8x36% / 4.6x40% / 5.4x42% / 5.8x44% / 6.2x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.6x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.1x
Headroom (turns)
-1%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -1% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.6x, adding 1.9 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$18.6M$18.6M18.1%
Year 1$19.2M+$3.6M$22.8M22.1%
Year 2$19.7M+$5.4M$25.2M24.4%
Year 3$20.3M+$5.4M$25.8M25.0%
Year 4$20.9M+$5.4M$26.4M25.6%
Year 5$21.6M+$5.4M$27.0M26.2%
$186.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$297.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$110.8M
Value Created
$27.0M
Exit EBITDA
$29.6M
Organic Growth
$54.2M
RCM Value Creation
$27.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.0M$1.5M$2.1M$2.5M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.0M$1.5M$2.0M$2.4M
A/R Days Reduction$627K$940K$1.3M$1.5M
Clean Claim Rate$33K$49K$66K$79K
Total$2.7M$4.1M$5.4M$6.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 101 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin18.1%-11.1%-1.6%12.0%
P86
Net-to-Gross32.1%29.1%37.8%47.4%
P33
Occupancy67.0%26.1%37.4%59.0%
P80
Rev/Bed$2.9M$387K$1.1M$2.1M
P92
Exp/Bed$2.4M$376K$979K$2.1M
P84

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML