Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 04:00 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL
CCN 360085 | OH | 1012 beds | Current EBITDA $-661.9M → Pro Forma $-552.1M (+$109.8M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$2.09B
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-661.9M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$109.8M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-552.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$80.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

66%
Realization (C)
$109.8M
Modeled Uplift
$72.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$37.7M
Execution Discount
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 66% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $72.1M (vs $109.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$41.7M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$41.3M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$25.4M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$1.3M
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$109.8M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$41.7M$41.7M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$40.2M$1.1M$41.3M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$6.4M$19.0M$25.4M$80.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$1.3M$1.3M$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT31.3% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$10.4M$20.9M$31.3M$41.7M$41.7M$41.7M$41.7M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$10.3M$20.7M$31.0M$41.3M$41.3M$41.3M$41.3M
A/R Days Reduction$0$8.5M$16.9M$25.4M$25.4M$25.4M$25.4M$25.4M
Clean Claim Rate$0$668K$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M
Cumulative$0$29.9M$59.8M$89.0M$109.8M$109.8M$109.8M$109.8M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $109.8M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-661.9M$-661.9M-31.7%
Year 1$-681.7M+$73.2M$-608.5M-29.2%
Year 2$-702.2M+$109.8M$-592.4M-28.4%
Year 3$-723.2M+$109.8M$-613.4M-29.4%
Year 4$-744.9M+$109.8M$-635.1M-30.4%
Year 5$-767.3M+$109.8M$-657.5M-31.5%
$-6.62B
Entry EV (10x)
$-7.23B
Exit EV (11x)
$-613.6M
Value Created
$-657.5M
Exit EBITDA
$-1.05B
Organic Growth
$1.10B
RCM Value Creation
$-657.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$20.9M$31.3M$41.7M$50.1M
Denial Rate Reductio$20.7M$31.0M$41.3M$49.6M
A/R Days Reduction$12.7M$19.0M$25.4M$30.5M
Clean Claim Rate$668K$1.0M$1.3M$1.6M
Total$54.9M$82.4M$109.8M$131.8M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 12 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-31.7%-20.8%-8.3%2.9%
P8
Net-to-Gross26.1%24.2%27.0%31.3%
P33
Occupancy79.1%65.4%74.6%78.3%
P75
Rev/Bed$2.1M$1.8M$2.2M$3.1M
P42
Exp/Bed$2.7M$2.1M$2.5M$2.9M
P58

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML