Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — HOLZER 2026-04-26 12:35 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — HOLZER
CCN 360054 | OH | 148 beds | Current EBITDA $34.5M → Pro Forma $45.3M (+$10.7M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$204.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$34.5M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$10.7M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$45.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$7.8M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

62%
Realization (C)
$10.7M
Modeled Uplift
$6.6M
Risk-Adjusted
-$4.1M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 62% of modeled bridge. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $6.6M (vs $10.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$4.1M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$4.0M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$2.5M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$131K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$10.7M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$4.1M$4.1M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$3.9M$112K$4.0M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$626K$1.9M$2.5M$7.8M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$131K$131K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT33.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.0M$2.0M$3.1M$4.1M$4.1M$4.1M$4.1M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.0M$2.0M$3.0M$4.0M$4.0M$4.0M$4.0M
A/R Days Reduction$0$828K$1.7M$2.5M$2.5M$2.5M$2.5M$2.5M
Clean Claim Rate$0$65K$131K$131K$131K$131K$131K$131K
Cumulative$0$2.9M$5.8M$8.7M$10.7M$10.7M$10.7M$10.7M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $10.7M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x50% / 7.5x54% / 8.7x58% / 9.9x60% / 10.5x62% / 11.1x
9.0x45% / 6.3x49% / 7.4x53% / 8.4x55% / 9.0x57% / 9.5x
10.0x40% / 5.3x45% / 6.3x49% / 7.3x51% / 7.7x52% / 8.2x
11.0x36% / 4.6x40% / 5.4x45% / 6.3x46% / 6.7x48% / 7.2x
12.0x31% / 3.9x36% / 4.7x41% / 5.5x43% / 5.9x45% / 6.3x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.5x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.0x
Headroom (turns)
1%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 1% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.5x, adding 2.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$34.5M$34.5M16.9%
Year 1$35.6M+$7.2M$42.7M20.9%
Year 2$36.6M+$10.7M$47.4M23.2%
Year 3$37.7M+$10.7M$48.5M23.7%
Year 4$38.9M+$10.7M$49.6M24.3%
Year 5$40.0M+$10.7M$50.8M24.9%
$345.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$558.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$213.1M
Value Created
$50.8M
Exit EBITDA
$55.0M
Organic Growth
$107.4M
RCM Value Creation
$50.8M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$2.0M$3.1M$4.1M$4.9M
Denial Rate Reductio$2.0M$3.0M$4.0M$4.8M
A/R Days Reduction$1.2M$1.9M$2.5M$3.0M
Clean Claim Rate$65K$98K$131K$157K
Total$5.4M$8.1M$10.7M$12.9M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 90 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin16.9%-9.6%0.5%7.3%
P90
Net-to-Gross33.5%21.6%27.4%33.4%
P75
Occupancy28.1%44.6%55.6%69.2%
P4
Rev/Bed$1.4M$703K$1.3M$1.6M
P56
Exp/Bed$1.1M$548K$1.2M$1.6M
P46

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML