Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — VIBRA HOSPITAL OF FARGO LLC 2026-04-26 05:18 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — VIBRA HOSPITAL OF FARGO LLC
CCN 352004 | ND | 31 beds | Current EBITDA $12.7M → Pro Forma $14.1M (+$1.4M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$27.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$12.7M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.4M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$14.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.0M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

74%
Realization (B)
$1.4M
Modeled Uplift
$1.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$373K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 74% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.1M (vs $1.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$544K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$538K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$331K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$17K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.4M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$544K$544K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$524K$15K$538K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$83K$247K$331K$1.0M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$17K$17K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT88.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$136K$272K$408K$544K$544K$544K$544K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$135K$269K$404K$538K$538K$538K$538K
A/R Days Reduction$0$110K$221K$331K$331K$331K$331K$331K
Clean Claim Rate$0$9K$17K$17K$17K$17K$17K$17K
Cumulative$0$390K$779K$1.2M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.4M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x43% / 6.1x48% / 7.1x52% / 8.1x54% / 8.6x56% / 9.2x
9.0x38% / 5.0x43% / 5.9x47% / 6.9x49% / 7.3x51% / 7.8x
10.0x33% / 4.2x38% / 5.0x42% / 5.8x44% / 6.3x46% / 6.7x
11.0x29% / 3.5x34% / 4.3x38% / 5.0x40% / 5.4x42% / 5.8x
12.0x24% / 3.0x30% / 3.6x34% / 4.3x36% / 4.7x38% / 5.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
7.6x
Pro Forma Leverage
-1.1x
Headroom (turns)
-17%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -17% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 7.6x, adding 0.9 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$12.7M$12.7M46.6%
Year 1$13.0M+$954K$14.0M51.5%
Year 2$13.4M+$1.4M$14.9M54.6%
Year 3$13.8M+$1.4M$15.3M56.1%
Year 4$14.2M+$1.4M$15.7M57.7%
Year 5$14.7M+$1.4M$16.1M59.2%
$126.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$177.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$50.6M
Value Created
$16.1M
Exit EBITDA
$20.2M
Organic Growth
$14.3M
RCM Value Creation
$16.1M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$272K$408K$544K$653K
Denial Rate Reductio$269K$404K$538K$646K
A/R Days Reduction$165K$248K$331K$397K
Clean Claim Rate$9K$13K$17K$21K
Total$715K$1.1M$1.4M$1.7M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 34 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin46.6%-20.4%-9.3%-3.1%
P97
Net-to-Gross23.5%54.3%72.1%88.5%
P0
Occupancy82.0%14.8%28.3%51.9%
P94
Rev/Bed$877K$405K$549K$883K
P70
Exp/Bed$469K$495K$556K$933K
P18

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML