Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — HEART OF AMERICA MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 05:22 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — HEART OF AMERICA MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 351332 | ND | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $-3.1M → Pro Forma $-1.8M (+$1.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$25.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-3.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-1.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$979K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

63%
Realization (C)
$1.3M
Modeled Uplift
$846K
Risk-Adjusted
-$496K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Payer DiversityHigher Payer Diversity increases execution likelih
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 63% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Commercial Payer %, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.8M (vs $1.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$510K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$505K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$310K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$16K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$510K$510K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$491K$14K$505K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$78K$232K$310K$979K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$16K$16K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT88.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$128K$255K$383K$510K$510K$510K$510K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$126K$253K$379K$505K$505K$505K$505K
A/R Days Reduction$0$103K$207K$310K$310K$310K$310K$310K
Clean Claim Rate$0$8K$16K$16K$16K$16K$16K$16K
Cumulative$0$366K$731K$1.1M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-3.1M$-3.1M-12.1%
Year 1$-3.2M+$895K$-2.3M-9.0%
Year 2$-3.3M+$1.3M$-1.9M-7.6%
Year 3$-3.4M+$1.3M$-2.0M-8.0%
Year 4$-3.5M+$1.3M$-2.1M-8.4%
Year 5$-3.6M+$1.3M$-2.2M-8.8%
$-30.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$-24.7M
Exit EV (11x)
$6.3M
Value Created
$-2.2M
Exit EBITDA
$-4.9M
Organic Growth
$13.4M
RCM Value Creation
$-2.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$255K$383K$510K$612K
Denial Rate Reductio$253K$379K$505K$606K
A/R Days Reduction$155K$233K$310K$373K
Clean Claim Rate$8K$12K$16K$20K
Total$671K$1.0M$1.3M$1.6M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 38 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-12.1%-20.4%-9.3%-2.2%
P38
Net-to-Gross55.0%55.0%76.0%88.5%
P24
Occupancy18.0%15.5%28.3%51.9%
P26
Rev/Bed$1.0M$450K$633K$976K
P76
Exp/Bed$1.1M$501K$630K$1.1M
P74

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML