Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — PAM SPECIALTY HOSP. OF ROCKY MOUNT 2026-04-26 15:41 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — PAM SPECIALTY HOSP. OF ROCKY MOUNT
CCN 342013 | NC | 50 beds | Current EBITDA $4.4M → Pro Forma $5.8M (+$1.4M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$27.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$4.4M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.4M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$5.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.0M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

71%
Realization (B)
$1.4M
Modeled Uplift
$1.0M
Risk-Adjusted
-$408K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 71% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.0M (vs $1.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$543K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$537K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$330K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$17K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.4M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$543K$543K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$522K$15K$537K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$83K$247K$330K$1.0M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$17K$17K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT38.3% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$136K$271K$407K$543K$543K$543K$543K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$134K$269K$403K$537K$537K$537K$537K
A/R Days Reduction$0$110K$220K$330K$330K$330K$330K$330K
Clean Claim Rate$0$9K$17K$17K$17K$17K$17K$17K
Cumulative$0$389K$778K$1.2M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.4M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x50% / 7.6x55% / 8.8x59% / 10.0x60% / 10.7x62% / 11.2x
9.0x45% / 6.4x50% / 7.5x54% / 8.6x56% / 9.1x57% / 9.6x
10.0x40% / 5.5x45% / 6.4x49% / 7.4x51% / 7.9x53% / 8.3x
11.0x36% / 4.7x41% / 5.5x45% / 6.4x47% / 6.9x49% / 7.3x
12.0x32% / 4.0x37% / 4.8x41% / 5.6x43% / 6.0x45% / 6.4x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.4x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.1x
Headroom (turns)
2%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 2% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.4x, adding 2.1 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$4.4M$4.4M16.1%
Year 1$4.5M+$952K$5.4M20.0%
Year 2$4.6M+$1.4M$6.1M22.3%
Year 3$4.8M+$1.4M$6.2M22.8%
Year 4$4.9M+$1.4M$6.3M23.3%
Year 5$5.1M+$1.4M$6.5M23.9%
$43.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$71.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$27.7M
Value Created
$6.5M
Exit EBITDA
$6.9M
Organic Growth
$14.3M
RCM Value Creation
$6.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$271K$407K$543K$651K
Denial Rate Reductio$269K$403K$537K$645K
A/R Days Reduction$165K$248K$330K$396K
Clean Claim Rate$9K$13K$17K$21K
Total$714K$1.1M$1.4M$1.7M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 56 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin16.1%-13.7%-3.5%6.1%
P91
Net-to-Gross22.1%25.3%30.3%38.3%
P13
Occupancy71.4%43.4%55.2%71.2%
P75
Rev/Bed$543K$525K$1.3M$1.9M
P26
Exp/Bed$456K$597K$1.4M$1.9M
P16

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML