Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — DAVIE MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 17:20 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — DAVIE MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 340187 | NC | 42 beds | Current EBITDA $29.8M → Pro Forma $35.5M (+$5.7M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$108.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$29.8M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$5.7M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$35.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$4.2M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

66%
Realization (C)
$5.7M
Modeled Uplift
$3.8M
Risk-Adjusted
-$2.0M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 66% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $3.8M (vs $5.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$2.2M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$2.1M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.3M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$69K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$5.7M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$2.2M$2.2M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$2.1M$60K$2.1M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$333K$987K$1.3M$4.2M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$69K$69K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT40.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$543K$1.1M$1.6M$2.2M$2.2M$2.2M$2.2M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$537K$1.1M$1.6M$2.1M$2.1M$2.1M$2.1M
A/R Days Reduction$0$440K$880K$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M
Clean Claim Rate$0$35K$69K$69K$69K$69K$69K$69K
Cumulative$0$1.6M$3.1M$4.6M$5.7M$5.7M$5.7M$5.7M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $5.7M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x46% / 6.6x51% / 7.7x55% / 8.8x56% / 9.4x58% / 9.9x
9.0x41% / 5.5x45% / 6.5x50% / 7.5x51% / 8.0x53% / 8.5x
10.0x36% / 4.7x41% / 5.5x45% / 6.4x47% / 6.8x49% / 7.3x
11.0x32% / 3.9x36% / 4.7x41% / 5.5x43% / 5.9x45% / 6.3x
12.0x27% / 3.3x32% / 4.1x37% / 4.8x39% / 5.2x41% / 5.5x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
7.1x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.6x
Headroom (turns)
-9%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -9% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 7.1x, adding 1.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$29.8M$29.8M27.5%
Year 1$30.7M+$3.8M$34.5M31.8%
Year 2$31.6M+$5.7M$37.3M34.4%
Year 3$32.6M+$5.7M$38.3M35.3%
Year 4$33.5M+$5.7M$39.2M36.2%
Year 5$34.5M+$5.7M$40.2M37.1%
$297.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$442.7M
Exit EV (11x)
$144.8M
Value Created
$40.2M
Exit EBITDA
$47.5M
Organic Growth
$57.1M
RCM Value Creation
$40.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.1M$1.6M$2.2M$2.6M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.1M$1.6M$2.1M$2.6M
A/R Days Reduction$660K$990K$1.3M$1.6M
Clean Claim Rate$35K$52K$69K$83K
Total$2.9M$4.3M$5.7M$6.8M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 53 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin27.5%-15.2%-3.7%6.1%
P96
Net-to-Gross22.3%26.8%32.5%40.8%
P14
Occupancy32.7%39.0%49.8%68.2%
P19
Rev/Bed$2.6M$531K$1.3M$2.0M
P88
Exp/Bed$1.9M$603K$1.4M$2.0M
P66

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML