Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — THE MOSES H. CONE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 04:03 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — THE MOSES H. CONE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
CCN 340091 | NC | 779 beds | Current EBITDA $-52.9M → Pro Forma $11.9M (+$64.8M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$1.23B
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-52.9M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$64.8M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$11.9M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$47.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

66%
Realization (C)
$64.8M
Modeled Uplift
$42.8M
Risk-Adjusted
-$22.0M
Execution Discount
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 66% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $42.8M (vs $64.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$24.6M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$24.4M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$15.0M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$789K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$64.8M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$24.6M$24.6M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$23.7M$678K$24.4M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$3.8M$11.2M$15.0M$47.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$789K$789K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT31.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$6.2M$12.3M$18.5M$24.6M$24.6M$24.6M$24.6M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$6.1M$12.2M$18.3M$24.4M$24.4M$24.4M$24.4M
A/R Days Reduction$0$5.0M$10.0M$15.0M$15.0M$15.0M$15.0M$15.0M
Clean Claim Rate$0$394K$789K$789K$789K$789K$789K$789K
Cumulative$0$17.7M$35.3M$52.6M$64.8M$64.8M$64.8M$64.8M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $64.8M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-37.6x
Pro Forma Leverage
44.1x
Headroom (turns)
679%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 679% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -37.6x, adding 136.6 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-52.9M$-52.9M-4.3%
Year 1$-54.5M+$43.2M$-11.3M-0.9%
Year 2$-56.1M+$64.8M$8.7M0.7%
Year 3$-57.8M+$64.8M$7.0M0.6%
Year 4$-59.6M+$64.8M$5.3M0.4%
Year 5$-61.3M+$64.8M$3.5M0.3%
$-529.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$38.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$567.4M
Value Created
$3.5M
Exit EBITDA
$-84.3M
Organic Growth
$648.2M
RCM Value Creation
$3.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$12.3M$18.5M$24.6M$29.6M
Denial Rate Reductio$12.2M$18.3M$24.4M$29.3M
A/R Days Reduction$7.5M$11.2M$15.0M$18.0M
Clean Claim Rate$394K$591K$789K$946K
Total$32.4M$48.6M$64.8M$77.8M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 16 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-4.3%-4.9%-2.2%7.1%
P38
Net-to-Gross30.4%25.8%29.4%31.2%
P56
Occupancy74.6%75.9%80.8%88.5%
P19
Rev/Bed$1.6M$1.6M$1.8M$2.7M
P25
Exp/Bed$1.6M$1.6M$1.9M$2.8M
P38

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML