Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — LITTLE FALLS HOSPITAL 2026-04-27 01:03 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — LITTLE FALLS HOSPITAL
CCN 331311 | NY | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $3.2M → Pro Forma $5.4M (+$2.2M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
EBITDA BRIDGE  ·  CCN 331311

LITTLE FALLS HOSPITAL
value-creation walk.

7-lever RCM bridge from current EBITDA to pro-forma — denial / underpay / DAR / coding / contract / cost discipline / cash acceleration. Each lever shows current vs benchmark target with data provenance.

$42.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$3.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.2M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$5.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.6M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

69%
Realization (C)
$2.2M
Modeled Uplift
$1.5M
Risk-Adjusted
-$690K
Execution Discount
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 69% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count, Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.5M (vs $2.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$850K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$842K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$517K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$27K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.2M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$850K$850K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$818K$23K$842K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$130K$387K$517K$1.6M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$27K$27K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT46.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$213K$425K$638K$850K$850K$850K$850K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$210K$421K$631K$842K$842K$842K$842K
A/R Days Reduction$0$172K$345K$517K$517K$517K$517K$517K
Clean Claim Rate$0$14K$27K$27K$27K$27K$27K$27K
Cumulative$0$609K$1.2M$1.8M$2.2M$2.2M$2.2M$2.2M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.2M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x60% / 10.3x64% / 11.8x68% / 13.3x70% / 14.1x72% / 14.8x
9.0x55% / 8.8x59% / 10.2x63% / 11.5x65% / 12.2x67% / 12.8x
10.0x50% / 7.6x55% / 8.8x59% / 10.0x60% / 10.6x62% / 11.2x
11.0x46% / 6.6x50% / 7.7x55% / 8.8x56% / 9.4x58% / 9.9x
12.0x42% / 5.8x47% / 6.8x51% / 7.8x53% / 8.3x55% / 8.8x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.5x
Headroom (turns)
23%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 23% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.0x, adding 3.5 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$3.2M$3.2M7.5%
Year 1$3.3M+$1.5M$4.8M11.3%
Year 2$3.4M+$2.2M$5.6M13.3%
Year 3$3.5M+$2.2M$5.7M13.5%
Year 4$3.6M+$2.2M$5.8M13.8%
Year 5$3.7M+$2.2M$6.0M14.0%
$32.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$65.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$33.4M
Value Created
$6.0M
Exit EBITDA
$5.1M
Organic Growth
$22.4M
RCM Value Creation
$6.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$425K$638K$850K$1.0M
Denial Rate Reductio$421K$631K$842K$1.0M
A/R Days Reduction$259K$388K$517K$621K
Clean Claim Rate$14K$20K$27K$33K
Total$1.1M$1.7M$2.2M$2.7M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 31 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin7.5%-27.8%-17.7%-9.7%
P87
Net-to-Gross44.3%37.6%44.3%46.9%
P50
Occupancy55.1%30.3%44.2%63.6%
P67
Rev/Bed$1.7M$998K$1.3M$2.0M
P63
Exp/Bed$1.6M$1.2M$1.7M$2.4M
P45

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML