Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — NEW YORK EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY 2026-04-26 09:04 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — NEW YORK EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY
CCN 330100 | NY | 15 beds | Current EBITDA $-31.5M → Pro Forma $-25.6M (+$5.9M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$112.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-31.5M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$5.9M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-25.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$4.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

69%
Realization (C)
$5.9M
Modeled Uplift
$4.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.8M
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityHigher Payer Diversity increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood

Expected realization: 69% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Payer Diversity. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $4.1M (vs $5.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$2.3M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$2.2M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.4M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$72K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$5.9M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$2.3M$2.3M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$2.2M$62K$2.2M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$346K$1.0M$1.4M$4.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$72K$72K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT49.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$564K$1.1M$1.7M$2.3M$2.3M$2.3M$2.3M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$559K$1.1M$1.7M$2.2M$2.2M$2.2M$2.2M
A/R Days Reduction$0$458K$915K$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M
Clean Claim Rate$0$36K$72K$72K$72K$72K$72K$72K
Cumulative$0$1.6M$3.2M$4.8M$5.9M$5.9M$5.9M$5.9M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $5.9M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-31.5M$-31.5M-28.0%
Year 1$-32.5M+$4.0M$-28.5M-25.3%
Year 2$-33.5M+$5.9M$-27.5M-24.4%
Year 3$-34.5M+$5.9M$-28.5M-25.3%
Year 4$-35.5M+$5.9M$-29.6M-26.2%
Year 5$-36.6M+$5.9M$-30.6M-27.1%
$-315.4M
Entry EV (10x)
$-336.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$-21.5M
Value Created
$-30.6M
Exit EBITDA
$-50.2M
Organic Growth
$59.4M
RCM Value Creation
$-30.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.1M$1.7M$2.3M$2.7M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.1M$1.7M$2.2M$2.7M
A/R Days Reduction$687K$1.0M$1.4M$1.6M
Clean Claim Rate$36K$54K$72K$87K
Total$3.0M$4.5M$5.9M$7.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 26 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-28.0%-26.5%-14.7%-7.8%
P16
Net-to-Gross27.0%40.9%44.3%49.0%
P4
Occupancy15.4%31.4%44.2%63.6%
P8
Rev/Bed$7.5M$994K$1.3M$1.9M
P96
Exp/Bed$9.6M$1.2M$1.6M$2.3M
P96

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML