Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — CENTRAL DESERT BEHAVIORAL HH 2026-04-26 09:29 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — CENTRAL DESERT BEHAVIORAL HH
CCN 324014 | NM | 64 beds | Current EBITDA $1.2M → Pro Forma $2.2M (+$948K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$18.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$1.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$948K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$2.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$691K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$948K
Modeled Uplift
$687K
Risk-Adjusted
-$262K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.7M (vs $0.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$360K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$357K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$219K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$12K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$948K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$360K$360K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$347K$10K$357K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$55K$164K$219K$691K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$12K$12K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT45.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$90K$180K$270K$360K$360K$360K$360K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$89K$178K$268K$357K$357K$357K$357K
A/R Days Reduction$0$73K$146K$219K$219K$219K$219K$219K
Clean Claim Rate$0$6K$12K$12K$12K$12K$12K$12K
Cumulative$0$258K$516K$769K$948K$948K$948K$948K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $948K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x61% / 11.0x66% / 12.6x70% / 14.1x72% / 14.9x74% / 15.7x
9.0x57% / 9.4x61% / 10.8x65% / 12.2x67% / 12.9x69% / 13.6x
10.0x52% / 8.1x57% / 9.4x61% / 10.7x62% / 11.3x64% / 11.9x
11.0x48% / 7.1x52% / 8.2x57% / 9.4x58% / 10.0x60% / 10.6x
12.0x44% / 6.2x49% / 7.3x53% / 8.3x55% / 8.9x57% / 9.4x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
4.7x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.8x
Headroom (turns)
27%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 27% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 4.7x, adding 3.7 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$1.2M$1.2M6.7%
Year 1$1.2M+$632K$1.9M10.4%
Year 2$1.3M+$948K$2.2M12.4%
Year 3$1.3M+$948K$2.3M12.6%
Year 4$1.4M+$948K$2.3M12.8%
Year 5$1.4M+$948K$2.3M13.0%
$12.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$25.8M
Exit EV (11x)
$13.7M
Value Created
$2.3M
Exit EBITDA
$1.9M
Organic Growth
$9.5M
RCM Value Creation
$2.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$180K$270K$360K$433K
Denial Rate Reductio$178K$268K$357K$428K
A/R Days Reduction$110K$164K$219K$263K
Clean Claim Rate$6K$9K$12K$14K
Total$474K$711K$948K$1.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 25 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin6.7%-11.8%5.0%12.5%
P52
Net-to-Gross55.6%20.2%33.1%45.0%
P83
Occupancy85.8%26.6%49.5%73.4%
P92
Rev/Bed$282K$416K$851K$1.1M
P9
Exp/Bed$263K$442K$738K$1.6M
P8

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML