Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ATLANTIC REHABILITATION INSTITUTE 2026-04-26 08:50 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ATLANTIC REHABILITATION INSTITUTE
CCN 313038 | NJ | 38 beds | Current EBITDA $5.3M → Pro Forma $6.5M (+$1.2M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$23.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$5.3M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.2M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$6.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$890K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

74%
Realization (B)
$1.2M
Modeled Uplift
$909K
Risk-Adjusted
-$312K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 74% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.9M (vs $1.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$464K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$460K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$282K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$15K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.2M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$464K$464K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$447K$13K$460K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$71K$211K$282K$890K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$15K$15K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT66.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$116K$232K$348K$464K$464K$464K$464K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$115K$230K$345K$460K$460K$460K$460K
A/R Days Reduction$0$94K$188K$282K$282K$282K$282K$282K
Clean Claim Rate$0$7K$15K$15K$15K$15K$15K$15K
Cumulative$0$333K$665K$990K$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.2M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x47% / 6.9x52% / 8.0x56% / 9.2x58% / 9.7x59% / 10.3x
9.0x42% / 5.8x47% / 6.8x51% / 7.8x53% / 8.3x54% / 8.8x
10.0x37% / 4.9x42% / 5.8x46% / 6.7x48% / 7.1x50% / 7.6x
11.0x33% / 4.1x38% / 5.0x42% / 5.8x44% / 6.2x46% / 6.6x
12.0x29% / 3.5x34% / 4.3x38% / 5.0x40% / 5.4x42% / 5.8x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.9x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.4x
Headroom (turns)
-6%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -6% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.9x, adding 1.6 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$5.3M$5.3M22.9%
Year 1$5.5M+$814K$6.3M27.0%
Year 2$5.6M+$1.2M$6.8M29.5%
Year 3$5.8M+$1.2M$7.0M30.2%
Year 4$6.0M+$1.2M$7.2M31.0%
Year 5$6.2M+$1.2M$7.4M31.8%
$53.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$81.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$28.0M
Value Created
$7.4M
Exit EBITDA
$8.5M
Organic Growth
$12.2M
RCM Value Creation
$7.4M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$232K$348K$464K$557K
Denial Rate Reductio$230K$345K$460K$552K
A/R Days Reduction$141K$212K$282K$339K
Clean Claim Rate$7K$11K$15K$18K
Total$611K$916K$1.2M$1.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 17 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin22.9%-24.8%-3.8%9.5%
P94
Net-to-Gross55.9%17.0%47.2%66.9%
P65
Occupancy86.7%55.2%70.8%75.7%
P82
Rev/Bed$611K$415K$595K$702K
P53
Exp/Bed$471K$434K$495K$986K
P35

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML