Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — THE REHAB HOSPITAL AT RARITAN BAY 2026-04-26 09:34 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — THE REHAB HOSPITAL AT RARITAN BAY
CCN 312018 | NJ | 76 beds | Current EBITDA $357K → Pro Forma $1.9M (+$1.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$28.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$357K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$1.9M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

68%
Realization (C)
$1.5M
Modeled Uplift
$1.0M
Risk-Adjusted
-$473K
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 68% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.0M (vs $1.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$570K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$564K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$347K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$18K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$570K$570K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$548K$16K$564K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$87K$259K$347K$1.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$18K$18K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT50.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$142K$285K$427K$570K$570K$570K$570K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$141K$282K$423K$564K$564K$564K$564K
A/R Days Reduction$0$116K$231K$347K$347K$347K$347K$347K
Clean Claim Rate$0$9K$18K$18K$18K$18K$18K$18K
Cumulative$0$408K$816K$1.2M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x105% / 35.9x109% / 40.2x114% / 44.6x116% / 46.8x118% / 48.9x
9.0x99% / 31.5x104% / 35.4x108% / 39.3x110% / 41.2x112% / 43.1x
10.0x95% / 28.1x99% / 31.5x104% / 35.0x106% / 36.8x108% / 38.5x
11.0x91% / 25.2x95% / 28.4x99% / 31.5x101% / 33.1x103% / 34.7x
12.0x87% / 22.8x91% / 25.7x96% / 28.6x98% / 30.1x99% / 31.5x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
1.6x
Pro Forma Leverage
4.9x
Headroom (turns)
75%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 75% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 1.6x, adding 6.8 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$357K$357K1.3%
Year 1$368K+$999K$1.4M4.8%
Year 2$379K+$1.5M$1.9M6.6%
Year 3$391K+$1.5M$1.9M6.6%
Year 4$402K+$1.5M$1.9M6.7%
Year 5$414K+$1.5M$1.9M6.7%
$3.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$21.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$17.5M
Value Created
$1.9M
Exit EBITDA
$569K
Organic Growth
$15.0M
RCM Value Creation
$1.9M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$285K$427K$570K$683K
Denial Rate Reductio$282K$423K$564K$677K
A/R Days Reduction$173K$260K$347K$416K
Clean Claim Rate$9K$14K$18K$22K
Total$749K$1.1M$1.5M$1.8M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 40 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin1.3%-25.7%-5.7%2.5%
P65
Net-to-Gross17.0%14.3%22.0%50.6%
P38
Occupancy55.2%50.0%56.1%74.0%
P42
Rev/Bed$375K$413K$628K$1.4M
P18
Exp/Bed$370K$458K$855K$1.5M
P8

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML