Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ST. MARYS HOSPITAL - PASSAIC 2026-04-26 05:23 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ST. MARYS HOSPITAL - PASSAIC
CCN 310006 | NJ | 122 beds | Current EBITDA $1.6M → Pro Forma $10.7M (+$9.1M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$173.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$1.6M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$9.1M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$10.7M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$6.7M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

69%
Realization (C)
$9.1M
Modeled Uplift
$6.3M
Risk-Adjusted
-$2.8M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 69% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $6.3M (vs $9.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$3.5M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$3.4M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$2.1M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$111K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$9.1M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$3.5M$3.5M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$3.3M$96K$3.4M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$533K$1.6M$2.1M$6.7M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$111K$111K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT28.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$869K$1.7M$2.6M$3.5M$3.5M$3.5M$3.5M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$860K$1.7M$2.6M$3.4M$3.4M$3.4M$3.4M
A/R Days Reduction$0$705K$1.4M$2.1M$2.1M$2.1M$2.1M$2.1M
Clean Claim Rate$0$56K$111K$111K$111K$111K$111K$111K
Cumulative$0$2.5M$5.0M$7.4M$9.1M$9.1M$9.1M$9.1M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $9.1M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x116% / 47.1x121% / 52.8x126% / 58.4x128% / 61.1x130% / 64.0x
9.0x111% / 41.5x116% / 46.5x120% / 51.5x122% / 54.0x124% / 56.5x
10.0x106% / 37.1x111% / 41.5x115% / 46.0x117% / 48.3x119% / 50.5x
11.0x102% / 33.4x106% / 37.5x111% / 41.5x113% / 43.6x115% / 45.6x
12.0x98% / 30.4x103% / 34.1x107% / 37.8x109% / 39.7x111% / 41.5x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
1.3x
Pro Forma Leverage
5.2x
Headroom (turns)
81%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 81% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 1.3x, adding 7.2 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$1.6M$1.6M0.9%
Year 1$1.6M+$6.1M$7.7M4.5%
Year 2$1.7M+$9.1M$10.8M6.2%
Year 3$1.7M+$9.1M$10.9M6.3%
Year 4$1.8M+$9.1M$10.9M6.3%
Year 5$1.8M+$9.1M$11.0M6.3%
$15.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$120.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$104.9M
Value Created
$11.0M
Exit EBITDA
$2.5M
Organic Growth
$91.4M
RCM Value Creation
$11.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.7M$2.6M$3.5M$4.2M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.7M$2.6M$3.4M$4.1M
A/R Days Reduction$1.1M$1.6M$2.1M$2.5M
Clean Claim Rate$56K$83K$111K$133K
Total$4.6M$6.9M$9.1M$11.0M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 51 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin0.9%-25.2%-6.7%2.0%
P69
Net-to-Gross22.1%14.3%20.1%28.2%
P61
Occupancy58.1%50.2%56.5%74.5%
P53
Rev/Bed$1.4M$483K$1.1M$1.5M
P73
Exp/Bed$1.4M$549K$1.2M$1.6M
P59

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML