Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ELLIOT HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 05:00 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ELLIOT HOSPITAL
CCN 300012 | NH | 215 beds | Current EBITDA $95.8M → Pro Forma $130.6M (+$34.8M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$660.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$95.8M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$34.8M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$130.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$25.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

76%
Realization (B)
$34.8M
Modeled Uplift
$26.4M
Risk-Adjusted
-$8.3M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 76% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $26.4M (vs $34.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$13.2M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$13.1M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$8.0M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$423K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$34.8M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$13.2M$13.2M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$12.7M$363K$13.1M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$2.0M$6.0M$8.0M$25.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$423K$423K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT34.7% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$3.3M$6.6M$9.9M$13.2M$13.2M$13.2M$13.2M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$3.3M$6.5M$9.8M$13.1M$13.1M$13.1M$13.1M
A/R Days Reduction$0$2.7M$5.4M$8.0M$8.0M$8.0M$8.0M$8.0M
Clean Claim Rate$0$211K$423K$423K$423K$423K$423K$423K
Cumulative$0$9.5M$18.9M$28.2M$34.8M$34.8M$34.8M$34.8M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $34.8M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x51% / 7.9x56% / 9.1x60% / 10.4x61% / 11.0x63% / 11.6x
9.0x46% / 6.7x51% / 7.8x55% / 8.8x57% / 9.4x58% / 9.9x
10.0x41% / 5.7x46% / 6.7x50% / 7.6x52% / 8.1x54% / 8.6x
11.0x37% / 4.8x42% / 5.8x46% / 6.7x48% / 7.1x50% / 7.5x
12.0x33% / 4.2x38% / 5.0x42% / 5.8x44% / 6.2x46% / 6.7x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.2x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.3x
Headroom (turns)
4%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 4% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.2x, adding 2.3 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$95.8M$95.8M14.5%
Year 1$98.7M+$23.2M$121.9M18.4%
Year 2$101.6M+$34.8M$136.4M20.6%
Year 3$104.7M+$34.8M$139.5M21.1%
Year 4$107.8M+$34.8M$142.6M21.6%
Year 5$111.1M+$34.8M$145.8M22.1%
$958.0M
Entry EV (10x)
$1.60B
Exit EV (11x)
$646.1M
Value Created
$145.8M
Exit EBITDA
$152.6M
Organic Growth
$347.6M
RCM Value Creation
$145.8M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$6.6M$9.9M$13.2M$15.9M
Denial Rate Reductio$6.5M$9.8M$13.1M$15.7M
A/R Days Reduction$4.0M$6.0M$8.0M$9.6M
Clean Claim Rate$211K$317K$423K$507K
Total$17.4M$26.1M$34.8M$41.7M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 9 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin14.5%-4.4%-0.5%11.6%
P75
Net-to-Gross40.1%29.1%30.2%35.6%
P75
Occupancy88.3%69.8%80.6%83.4%
P78
Rev/Bed$3.1M$1.7M$2.1M$2.8M
P75
Exp/Bed$2.6M$1.1M$1.9M$2.6M
P67

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML