Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — CARSON VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 09:05 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — CARSON VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 291306 | NV | 23 beds | Current EBITDA $5.7M → Pro Forma $10.1M (+$4.4M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$84.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$5.7M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$4.4M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$10.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$3.2M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

71%
Realization (B)
$4.4M
Modeled Uplift
$3.2M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.3M
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 71% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $3.2M (vs $4.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.7M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.7M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.0M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$54K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$4.4M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.7M$1.7M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.6M$46K$1.7M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$259K$767K$1.0M$3.2M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$54K$54K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT54.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$422K$843K$1.3M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$417K$835K$1.3M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M
A/R Days Reduction$0$342K$684K$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M
Clean Claim Rate$0$27K$54K$54K$54K$54K$54K$54K
Cumulative$0$1.2M$2.4M$3.6M$4.4M$4.4M$4.4M$4.4M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $4.4M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x61% / 10.9x66% / 12.5x70% / 14.1x72% / 14.9x73% / 15.7x
9.0x56% / 9.3x61% / 10.8x65% / 12.2x67% / 12.8x68% / 13.6x
10.0x52% / 8.1x56% / 9.3x60% / 10.6x62% / 11.2x64% / 11.9x
11.0x48% / 7.1x52% / 8.2x56% / 9.3x58% / 9.9x60% / 10.5x
12.0x44% / 6.2x49% / 7.2x53% / 8.3x55% / 8.8x56% / 9.3x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
4.8x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.7x
Headroom (turns)
27%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 27% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 4.8x, adding 3.7 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$5.7M$5.7M6.8%
Year 1$5.9M+$3.0M$8.8M10.5%
Year 2$6.0M+$4.4M$10.5M12.4%
Year 3$6.2M+$4.4M$10.7M12.6%
Year 4$6.4M+$4.4M$10.8M12.9%
Year 5$6.6M+$4.4M$11.0M13.1%
$56.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$121.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$64.5M
Value Created
$11.0M
Exit EBITDA
$9.1M
Organic Growth
$44.4M
RCM Value Creation
$11.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$843K$1.3M$1.7M$2.0M
Denial Rate Reductio$835K$1.3M$1.7M$2.0M
A/R Days Reduction$513K$769K$1.0M$1.2M
Clean Claim Rate$27K$40K$54K$65K
Total$2.2M$3.3M$4.4M$5.3M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 16 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin6.8%-18.4%-1.1%8.0%
P62
Net-to-Gross31.4%22.0%44.4%54.5%
P31
Occupancy47.2%23.0%41.3%56.0%
P62
Rev/Bed$3.7M$657K$1.1M$1.5M
P94
Exp/Bed$3.4M$518K$1.3M$1.7M
P94

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML