Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — BATTLE MOUNTAIN GENERAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 05:24 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — BATTLE MOUNTAIN GENERAL HOSPITAL
CCN 291303 | NV | 5 beds | Current EBITDA $-5.0M → Pro Forma $-4.3M (+$659K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$12.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-5.0M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$659K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-4.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+529bps
Margin Improvement
$478K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

63%
Realization (C)
$659K
Modeled Uplift
$417K
Risk-Adjusted
-$242K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli

Expected realization: 63% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Commercial Payer %, Revenue per Bed. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.4M (vs $0.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$249K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$248K
+199bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$152K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+8bp
Total EBITDA Impact$659K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$249K$249K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$240K$8K$248K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$38K$113K$152K$478K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT62.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$62K$125K$187K$249K$249K$249K$249K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$62K$124K$186K$248K$248K$248K$248K
A/R Days Reduction$0$51K$101K$152K$152K$152K$152K$152K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$180K$360K$535K$659K$659K$659K$659K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $659K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-5.0M$-5.0M-39.8%
Year 1$-5.1M+$439K$-4.7M-37.4%
Year 2$-5.3M+$659K$-4.6M-36.9%
Year 3$-5.4M+$659K$-4.8M-38.2%
Year 4$-5.6M+$659K$-4.9M-39.5%
Year 5$-5.7M+$659K$-5.1M-40.8%
$-49.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$-56.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$-6.4M
Value Created
$-5.1M
Exit EBITDA
$-7.9M
Organic Growth
$6.6M
RCM Value Creation
$-5.1M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$125K$187K$249K$299K
Denial Rate Reductio$124K$186K$248K$298K
A/R Days Reduction$76K$114K$152K$182K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$329K$494K$659K$791K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 50 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-39.8%-35.5%-8.7%4.8%
P24
Net-to-Gross64.9%27.9%46.5%62.1%
P76
Occupancy10.8%11.7%20.0%37.6%
P22
Rev/Bed$2.5M$816K$1.7M$2.7M
P66
Exp/Bed$3.5M$1.2M$1.6M$2.8M
P82

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML