Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MT. GRANT GENERAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 03:43 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MT. GRANT GENERAL HOSPITAL
CCN 291300 | NV | 11 beds | Current EBITDA $-4.1M → Pro Forma $-3.3M (+$761K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$14.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-4.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$761K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-3.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+527bps
Margin Improvement
$555K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

64%
Realization (C)
$761K
Modeled Uplift
$488K
Risk-Adjusted
-$273K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 64% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Commercial Payer %, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.5M (vs $0.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$289K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$287K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$176K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+7bp
Total EBITDA Impact$761K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$289K$289K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$278K$8K$287K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$44K$132K$176K$555K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT69.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$72K$145K$217K$289K$289K$289K$289K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$72K$143K$215K$287K$287K$287K$287K
A/R Days Reduction$0$59K$117K$176K$176K$176K$176K$176K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$207K$415K$617K$761K$761K$761K$761K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $761K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-4.1M$-4.1M-28.3%
Year 1$-4.2M+$508K$-3.7M-25.7%
Year 2$-4.3M+$761K$-3.6M-24.8%
Year 3$-4.5M+$761K$-3.7M-25.7%
Year 4$-4.6M+$761K$-3.8M-26.6%
Year 5$-4.7M+$761K$-4.0M-27.6%
$-41.0M
Entry EV (10x)
$-43.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$-2.9M
Value Created
$-4.0M
Exit EBITDA
$-6.5M
Organic Growth
$7.6M
RCM Value Creation
$-4.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$145K$217K$289K$347K
Denial Rate Reductio$143K$215K$287K$344K
A/R Days Reduction$88K$132K$176K$211K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$381K$571K$761K$914K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 716 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-28.3%-24.0%-9.0%1.7%
P21
Net-to-Gross54.5%39.7%56.5%69.9%
P47
Occupancy28.8%15.6%26.2%43.8%
P56
Rev/Bed$1.3M$645K$1.2M$2.0M
P55
Exp/Bed$1.7M$770K$1.3M$2.2M
P61

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML