Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — HENDERSON HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 14:10 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — HENDERSON HOSPITAL
CCN 290057 | NV | 288 beds | Current EBITDA $77.1M → Pro Forma $96.0M (+$18.8M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$358.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$77.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$18.8M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$96.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$13.7M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$18.8M
Modeled Uplift
$13.5M
Risk-Adjusted
-$5.4M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $13.5M (vs $18.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$7.2M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$7.1M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$4.4M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$229K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$18.8M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$7.2M$7.2M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$6.9M$197K$7.1M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.1M$3.3M$4.4M$13.7M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$229K$229K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT22.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.8M$3.6M$5.4M$7.2M$7.2M$7.2M$7.2M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.8M$3.5M$5.3M$7.1M$7.1M$7.1M$7.1M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.5M$2.9M$4.4M$4.4M$4.4M$4.4M$4.4M
Clean Claim Rate$0$115K$229K$229K$229K$229K$229K$229K
Cumulative$0$5.1M$10.3M$15.3M$18.8M$18.8M$18.8M$18.8M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $18.8M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x48% / 7.0x52% / 8.2x56% / 9.3x58% / 9.9x60% / 10.4x
9.0x42% / 5.9x47% / 6.9x51% / 7.9x53% / 8.4x55% / 8.9x
10.0x38% / 5.0x42% / 5.9x47% / 6.8x49% / 7.2x50% / 7.7x
11.0x33% / 4.2x38% / 5.0x42% / 5.9x44% / 6.3x46% / 6.7x
12.0x29% / 3.6x34% / 4.4x39% / 5.1x41% / 5.5x42% / 5.9x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.8x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.3x
Headroom (turns)
-5%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -5% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.8x, adding 1.7 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$77.1M$77.1M21.5%
Year 1$79.5M+$12.6M$92.0M25.7%
Year 2$81.8M+$18.8M$100.7M28.1%
Year 3$84.3M+$18.8M$103.1M28.8%
Year 4$86.8M+$18.8M$105.7M29.5%
Year 5$89.4M+$18.8M$108.3M30.2%
$771.4M
Entry EV (10x)
$1.19B
Exit EV (11x)
$419.6M
Value Created
$108.3M
Exit EBITDA
$122.9M
Organic Growth
$188.5M
RCM Value Creation
$108.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$3.6M$5.4M$7.2M$8.6M
Denial Rate Reductio$3.5M$5.3M$7.1M$8.5M
A/R Days Reduction$2.2M$3.3M$4.4M$5.2M
Clean Claim Rate$115K$172K$229K$275K
Total$9.4M$14.1M$18.8M$22.6M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 18 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin21.5%-20.9%1.5%10.1%
P94
Net-to-Gross8.3%8.6%11.4%22.6%
P11
Occupancy77.1%68.9%77.3%82.7%
P44
Rev/Bed$1.2M$642K$1.0M$1.5M
P61
Exp/Bed$976K$695K$966K$1.4M
P50

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML