Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — CARSON TAHOE REGIONAL HEALTHCARE 2026-04-26 05:05 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — CARSON TAHOE REGIONAL HEALTHCARE
CCN 290019 | NV | 175 beds | Current EBITDA $11.1M → Pro Forma $30.4M (+$19.2M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$365.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$11.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$19.2M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$30.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$14.0M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

74%
Realization (B)
$19.2M
Modeled Uplift
$14.2M
Risk-Adjusted
-$5.0M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 74% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $14.2M (vs $19.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$7.3M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$7.2M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$4.4M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$234K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$19.2M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$7.3M$7.3M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$7.0M$201K$7.2M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.1M$3.3M$4.4M$14.0M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$234K$234K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT39.3% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.8M$3.7M$5.5M$7.3M$7.3M$7.3M$7.3M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.8M$3.6M$5.4M$7.2M$7.2M$7.2M$7.2M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.5M$3.0M$4.4M$4.4M$4.4M$4.4M$4.4M
Clean Claim Rate$0$117K$234K$234K$234K$234K$234K$234K
Cumulative$0$5.2M$10.5M$15.6M$19.2M$19.2M$19.2M$19.2M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $19.2M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x78% / 17.9x82% / 20.2x86% / 22.6x88% / 23.7x90% / 24.9x
9.0x73% / 15.5x77% / 17.6x81% / 19.7x83% / 20.7x85% / 21.8x
10.0x69% / 13.6x73% / 15.5x77% / 17.4x79% / 18.3x81% / 19.3x
11.0x65% / 12.1x69% / 13.8x73% / 15.5x75% / 16.4x77% / 17.2x
12.0x61% / 10.8x65% / 12.4x69% / 13.9x71% / 14.7x73% / 15.5x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
3.1x
Pro Forma Leverage
3.4x
Headroom (turns)
52%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 52% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 3.1x, adding 5.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$11.1M$11.1M3.0%
Year 1$11.5M+$12.8M$24.3M6.6%
Year 2$11.8M+$19.2M$31.0M8.5%
Year 3$12.2M+$19.2M$31.4M8.6%
Year 4$12.5M+$19.2M$31.8M8.7%
Year 5$12.9M+$19.2M$32.1M8.8%
$111.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$353.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$242.1M
Value Created
$32.1M
Exit EBITDA
$17.7M
Organic Growth
$192.3M
RCM Value Creation
$32.1M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$3.7M$5.5M$7.3M$8.8M
Denial Rate Reductio$3.6M$5.4M$7.2M$8.7M
A/R Days Reduction$2.2M$3.3M$4.4M$5.3M
Clean Claim Rate$117K$175K$234K$281K
Total$9.6M$14.4M$19.2M$23.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 22 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin3.0%-16.7%-0.8%9.3%
P64
Net-to-Gross26.1%10.2%16.5%39.3%
P55
Occupancy78.0%56.3%67.1%76.6%
P82
Rev/Bed$2.1M$206K$582K$1.3M
P95
Exp/Bed$2.0M$244K$658K$1.3M
P95

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML