Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ST. ROSE DOMINICAN - DELIMA 2026-04-26 04:05 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ST. ROSE DOMINICAN - DELIMA
CCN 290012 | NV | 10 beds | Current EBITDA $-9.9M → Pro Forma $-8.7M (+$1.1M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$21.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-9.9M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.1M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-8.7M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$835K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

68%
Realization (C)
$1.1M
Modeled Uplift
$777K
Risk-Adjusted
-$368K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 68% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count, Revenue per Bed. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.8M (vs $1.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$435K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$431K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$265K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$14K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.1M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$435K$435K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$419K$12K$431K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$67K$198K$265K$835K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$14K$14K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT71.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$109K$218K$326K$435K$435K$435K$435K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$108K$215K$323K$431K$431K$431K$431K
A/R Days Reduction$0$88K$177K$265K$265K$265K$265K$265K
Clean Claim Rate$0$7K$14K$14K$14K$14K$14K$14K
Cumulative$0$312K$624K$928K$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.1M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-9.9M$-9.9M-45.3%
Year 1$-10.2M+$763K$-9.4M-43.2%
Year 2$-10.5M+$1.1M$-9.3M-42.8%
Year 3$-10.8M+$1.1M$-9.6M-44.2%
Year 4$-11.1M+$1.1M$-10.0M-45.7%
Year 5$-11.4M+$1.1M$-10.3M-47.3%
$-98.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$-113.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$-14.5M
Value Created
$-10.3M
Exit EBITDA
$-15.7M
Organic Growth
$11.5M
RCM Value Creation
$-10.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$218K$326K$435K$522K
Denial Rate Reductio$215K$323K$431K$517K
A/R Days Reduction$132K$199K$265K$318K
Clean Claim Rate$7K$10K$14K$17K
Total$573K$859K$1.1M$1.4M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 617 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-45.3%-24.2%-8.9%2.2%
P12
Net-to-Gross10.5%40.9%57.6%71.6%
P1
Occupancy41.7%15.4%26.1%44.4%
P73
Rev/Bed$2.2M$656K$1.2M$2.0M
P77
Exp/Bed$3.2M$773K$1.3M$2.2M
P87

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML